552 (SC) Zaveri Diamonds v. CIT 11-12 3
118 Taxmann.com 166High Court2020#1826 most cited
What is 552 (SC) Zaveri Diamonds v. CIT 11-12 3 authority for?
Where an assessee fails to provide confirmations for cash deposits or to authenticate the source of cash from business sales, tax authorities are justified in adding such amounts as unexplained income.
62
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Ravinder Kumar v. Income Tax Officer · cash deposits · unexplained cash entries · bank account · Kirana business · taxable income · confirmation · Assessing Officer · tax authorities · Section 68
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 552 (SC) Zaveri Diamonds v. CIT 11-12 3
Showing 1–20 of 62 · Page 1 of 4