SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2),, RAJKOT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the depositors for the unexplained cash credits. Therefore, the additions made by the AO were justified.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) heard a consolidated batch of appeals concerning unexplained cash deposits in bank accounts. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings under section 153A following a search action, and made additions for cash deposits that did not match the returned income.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee discharged the burden of proof for unexplained cash deposits, and if the peak credit theory was applicable in this case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 144,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 271(1)(c),Section 68,Section 69,Section 69A,Section 69D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- Roshan Di Hatti v. CIT477 citing2 SCC 378 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Nemi Chand Kothari v. CIT340 citing185 CTR 635 · 2003
- CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji Mistry278 citing44 ITR 891 · 1962 · SC · Read judgment
- Manoj Aggarwal v. DCIT97 citing113 ITD 377 · 2008 · ITAT
- CIT v. Indian Express (Madurai) Pvt. Ltd.93 citing140 ITR 705 · 1983 · HC
- 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekh Banerjee v. CIT 1-10 285 citing69 Taxmann.com 219 · 2016 · SC
- 552 (SC) Zaveri Diamonds v. CIT 11-12 362 citing118 Taxmann.com 166 · 2020 · HC
- Sh. Rajesh Kumar Jain v. ACIT Hon'ble High Court Of Delhi62 citing84 Taxmann.com 257 · 2017 · HC
- Arunkumar J. Muchhala v. Commissioner of Income Tax50 citing85 Taxmann.com 306 · 2017 · HC
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Arulmurugan and Company49 citing51 STC 381 · 1982 · HC
- Ramco Cement Limited v. DCIT43 citing55 Taxmann.com 79 · 2015 · HC
- Point E COT v. Vijay Agricultural Industries37 citing294 ITR 610 · 2007 · HC
- Sudhir Kumar Sharma (HUF) v. CIT37 citing46 Taxmann.com 340 · 2014 · HC
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. D.K. Garg35 citing404 ITR 757 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- Distributor (Baroda) Private Limited v. Union of India35 citing22 Taxmann 49 · 1985 · SC
- 300 CTR 51027 citing300 CTR 510 · 2018 · HC
- Namdev Arora v. CIT22 citing72 Taxmann.com 124 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Dr Prakash Tiwari v. CIT15 citing160 Taxmann.com 83 · 2024 · HC
- 83 (Jharkhand) (f) Dr. Prakash Tiwari v. Commissioner of Income-tax9 citing14 Taxmann 252 · 1983 · HC
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT BEFORE DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 134 & 135/RJT/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Years: (2007-08 & 2008-09)
Income Tax Officer, Ward- Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, 5th Vs. Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Floor, Room No. 517, Race Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 Colony, Rajkot-360 001 001 स्थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No.: ADRPT 5807 E (Appellant) (Respondent) CO. No. 01&02/RJT/2023 (a/o ITA No.134 & 135/Rjt/2023) (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: (2007-08 & 2008-09)
Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Colony, Rajkot-360 001 The Income Tax Officer, Ward- 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, 5th Floor, Vs.
Room No. 517, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360001 स्थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No.: ADRPT 5807 E (Applicant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 16/RJT/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ष / Assessment Year: (2010-11)
Damjibhai Lekharj Tharvani C/o. Sarda & Sarda, CAs, 1st Floor, "Sakar" Opp. Rajkumar College, Dr.
Radhakrishnan Road, Rajkot-360 001 Vs.
Income Tax Officer,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026