49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekh Banerjee v. CIT 1-10 2
69 Taxmann.com 219Supreme Court of India2016#1338 most cited
What is 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekh Banerjee v. CIT 1-10 2 authority for?
Cash deposited in a bank account that remains unexplained can be added as income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, even if the assessee does not maintain formal books of account.
85
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Sudhir Kumar Sharma HUF v. CIT · 69 taxmann.com 219 · section 68 · unexplained cash credit · bank deposits · onus on assessee · books of account · passbook
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing 49 ITR 112 (SC) Sreelekh Banerjee v. CIT 1-10 2
Showing 1–20 of 85 · Page 1 of 5