DCIT, NOIDA vs. M/S. L.G. ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. LTD., GREATER NOIDA

ITA 1969/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 October 2025AY 2011-1264 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that while AMP expenses can constitute an international transaction, the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is not leviable for mere disallowance of expenditure if the assessee has disclosed all particulars. The penalty order was also found to be barred by limitation in one instance.

What were the facts?

The assessee, LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., incurred significant Advertisement, Marketing, and Sales Promotion (AMP) expenses. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) treated these expenses as an international transaction, arguing that a portion was for brand promotion of the parent company and sought compensation.

What were the issues?

Whether AMP expenses constitute an international transaction requiring separate benchmarking, and whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) is leviable for such expenses or due to procedural limitations.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 92B,Section 271(1)(c),Section 275

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(24)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “I”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA Nos. 6838/Del/2017 & 7424/Del/2018 (Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14) A Wing, Third Floor, D-3, Special Range-5, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACL1745Q A Wing, Third Floor, D-3, Circle-2, Noida (UP) District Centre, Saket, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACL1745Q

ITA Nos. 433 & 430/Del/2024 (Assessment Years: 2005-06 & 2006-07) A Wing, Third Floor, D-3, Circle-13(1), District Centre, Saket, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACL1745Q Circle-2, Noida (UP) A Wing, Third Floor, D-3, District Centre, Saket, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACL1745Q A Wing, Third Floor, D-3, Circle-15(2), District Centre, Saket, New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACL1745Q Circle-15(2), A Wing, Third Floor, D-3,

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 92B

All 1,158 judgments and leading authorities on Section 92B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →