LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

140 ITD 41Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2013#1022 most cited

What is LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

AMP (Advertising, Marketing, and Promotion) expenditure incurred by a subsidiary for promoting the brand of its foreign parent company constitutes an international transaction and requires separate benchmarking under transfer pricing regulations.

107

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

LG Electronics India v ACIT · 140 ITD 41 · AMP expenditure · international transaction · benchmarking analysis · bright line test · brand promotion · section 92B · section 92CA(1) · transfer pricing

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee Ground Nos 9 & 10 is allowed

ITA 1169/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjeeand\Nshri Prabhash Shankar\Nita No.1169/Mum/2014\N(Assessment Year: 2009-10)\Nm/S Vodafone Digilink Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income\Nlimited,\Ntax, Cir.17(1), New Delhi\Nc-48, Okhla Industrial Area,\Nphase-Ii, New Delhi-110 020\Npan: Aaaca3202D\Nappellant\Nrespondent\Nassessee By\N:\Nshri Percy J. Pardiwalla/Wshri\Nketan Ved\Nrespondent By\N:\Nms. Vatsala Jha (Pcit)\Ndate Of Hearing\N:\N23/12/2024\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N:\N12/02/2025\Norder\Nper Anikesh Banerjee:\Ninstant Appeal Of The Assessee Was Filed Against The Order Of The Learned\Ndispute Resolution Panel-Ii, New Delhi-02 [For Brevity, ‘Ld.Drp') Passed Under\Nsection 144C(5) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Brevity, ‘The Act'),\Ndated21/11/2013 For A.Y. 2009-10. The Impugned Order Was Emanated From The\Ndraft Assessment Order U/S 144C(1) R.W.S.143(3) Of The Actdated 28/03/2013 Of\Nthe Ld.Dcit, Circle-17(1), New Delhi (For Brevity The Ld. Ao).\N2\Nita No.1169/Mum/2014\Nvodafone Digilink Limited\N2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: -\N“The Appellant Respectfully Submits That:\Non The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Dispute\Nresolution Panel -11. New Delhi (Drp\") Has Erred In Passing The Order Under\Nsection 144C(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act\"), Partly Confirming The\Nadjustments Proposed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 17(1)\Nnew Delhi ("Ao') In The Draft Assessment Order & The Learned Ao Has\Naccordingly Erred In Passing The Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) Read With\Nsection 144C Of The Act.\Neach Of The Ground Is Referred To Separately, Which May Kindly Be Considered\Nindependent Of Each Other.\N1. On Amortization Of Revenue Based License Fee U/S 35Abb Of The Act\N1.

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 144C(5)Section 35ASection 36(1)(m)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 43(1)

…applied a mark-up of 15.46% on the\nassessee's alleged excessive AMP expenses.\n11. 3. The DRP vide its directions dated 18/12/2013, relying on the decision of the\nSpecial Bench of the Tribunal in the case of LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT\n(2013) 140 ITD 41 (Delhi) (SB), upheld the applicability of the bight line test while\ncomputing the ALP of the AMP expenditure. It further upheld the TPO's stand of\nadding a markup of 15.46% on the ALP of the AMP expenditure.Pursuant to the\nDRP Directions, the Ld. AO in terms of the Final Assessment Order dated\n30/01/2014 inter-alia made an addition of Rs.2,84,…

NIKON INDIA P.LTD,GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1), GURGAON

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the Stay

ITA 1800/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Stay Application No.256/Del/2022 (Ita No.1800/Del/2022) Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit, Plot No.71, Sector-32, Circle-3(1), Institutional Area, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana – 122001. Pan: Aaccn5100F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vishal Kalra & Shri Ankit Sahani, Advocates; & Shri Yishu Goel, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rajesh Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 Order Per M. Balaganesh, Am: The Appeal In Ita No.1800/Del/2022 & The Stay Application In Sa No.256/Del/2022 Filed By The Assessee Arise Out Of The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 Sa No.256/Del/2022 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 25.07.2022 By The Assessment Unit, Of The Income Tax Department (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Ao’).

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra &For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : I : DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Stay Application No.256/Del/2022 (ITA No.1800/Del/2022) Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Vs ACIT, Plot No.71, Sector-32, Circle-3(1), Institutional Area, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana – 122001. PAN: AACCN5100F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vishal Kalra & Shri Ankit Sahani, Advocates; & Shri Yishu Goel, AR Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 19.07.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 ORDER…

Showing 120 of 107 · Page 1 of 6