LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

140 ITD 41Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2013#1007 most cited

What is LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

The Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer can benchmark Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses as an international transaction if it creates or is intended to create economic or commercial benefit for an associated enterprise. The 'bright line' method can be used for this purpose.

107

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT · 140 ITD 41 · AMP expenses · international transaction · section 92B · section 92F · bright line method · benchmarking · associated enterprise

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Nikon India P.Ltd, Gurgaon vs. ACIT, Circle-3(1), Gurgaon

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the Stay

ITA 1800/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Stay Application No.256/Del/2022 (Ita No.1800/Del/2022) Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit, Plot No.71, Sector-32, Circle-3(1), Institutional Area, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana – 122001. Pan: Aaccn5100F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vishal Kalra & Shri Ankit Sahani, Advocates; & Shri Yishu Goel, Ar Revenue By : Shri Rajesh Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 Order Per M. Balaganesh, Am: The Appeal In Ita No.1800/Del/2022 & The Stay Application In Sa No.256/Del/2022 Filed By The Assessee Arise Out Of The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) R.W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 Sa No.256/Del/2022 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 25.07.2022 By The Assessment Unit, Of The Income Tax Department (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Ao’).

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra &For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : I : DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Stay Application No.256/Del/2022 (ITA No.1800/Del/2022) Assessment Year: 2017-18 Nikon India Pvt. Ltd., Vs ACIT, Plot No.71, Sector-32, Circle-3(1), Institutional Area, Gurgaon. Gurgaon, Haryana – 122001. PAN: AACCN5100F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Vishal Kalra & Shri Ankit Sahani, Advocates; & Shri Yishu Goel, AR Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 19.07.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 ORDER…

LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (140 ITD 41) — Cited in 107 Judgments | BharatTax