CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro
88 Taxmann.com 178Supreme Court of India2017#1204 most cited
What is CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro authority for?
Subsidies granted under a Government Industrial Scheme to accelerate industrial development and generate employment are capital in nature, determined by the 'purpose test', regardless of the timing, source, or form of the subsidy.
95
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro · 400 ITR 27 · subsidy · capital receipt · revenue receipt · purpose test · Government Industrial Scheme · industrial development · employment generation · section 41(1)(a) · section 43(1)
Also reported as
252 Taxmann 360400 ITR 27
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro
Showing 1–20 of 95 · Page 1 of 5