CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro

88 Taxmann.com 178Supreme Court of India2017#1204 most cited

What is CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro authority for?

Subsidies granted under a Government Industrial Scheme to accelerate industrial development and generate employment are capital in nature, determined by the 'purpose test', regardless of the timing, source, or form of the subsidy.

95

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro · 400 ITR 27 · subsidy · capital receipt · revenue receipt · purpose test · Government Industrial Scheme · industrial development · employment generation · section 41(1)(a) · section 43(1)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro

SHYAM METALICS AMD ENERGY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1074/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Sept 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Year: 2014-15 Shyam Metalics & Engery Ltd…...………..............................……….……Appellant 83, Trinity Tower, 7Th Floor, Topsia, Kol-700046, [Pan: Aahcs5842A] Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-1(1), Kolkata…………………………...……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Praveen Kishore, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : July 23, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : September 15, 2025 Order Per Rajesh Kumar: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 08.04.2025 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- 22, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”].

Section 250Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member and Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shyam Metalics And Engery Ltd…...………..............................……….……Appellant 83, Trinity Tower, 7th Floor, Topsia, Kol-700046, [PAN: AAHCS5842A] vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(1), Kolkata…………………………...……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Akkal Dudhewala, AR, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Praveen Kishore, DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : July 23,…

Showing 120 of 95 · Page 1 of 5