IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. DCIT TDS, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that payments for roaming charges made by the assessee to OTOs are neither 'fees for technical services' nor 'royalty' and thus do not attract TDS under Section 194J. Consequently, the assessee cannot be held as an 'assessee-in-default' for non-deduction of tax on these payments.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Vodafone Idea Ltd., paid roaming charges to Other Telecom Operators (OTOs). The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) treated these payments as 'fees for technical services' or 'royalty' and held the assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194J. The assessee appealed these orders.
What were the issues?
Whether roaming charges paid to Other Telecom Operators constitute 'fees for technical services' or 'royalty' requiring TDS under Section 194J.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194J,Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 9(1)(vii),Section 9(1)(vi)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd. v. CIT914 citing125 Taxmann.com 42 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT394 citing288 ITR 408 · 2007 · SC
- Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DIT359 citing197 Taxmann 263 · 2011 · HC
- DIT v. New Skies Satellite BV325 citing68 Taxmann.com 8 · 2016 · HC
- DIT v. Nokia Networks OY276 citing358 ITR 259 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Siemens Aktiongesellschaft259 citing310 ITR 320 · 2009 · HC
- Skycell Communications Ltd. v. DCIT253 citing251 ITR 53 · 2001 · HC
- CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd.203 citing239 Taxmann 139 · 2016 · SC · Read judgment
- Berger Paints India Ltd. v. CIT181 citing135 Taxmann 586 · 2004 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Bharti Cellular Ltd.167 citing319 ITR 139 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- Verizon Communications Singapore Pte Ltd. v. ITO156 citing361 ITR 575 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Bharti Cellular Ltd.147 citing330 ITR 239 · 2011 · SC
- CIT v. Bharati Cellular Ltd.125 citing193 Taxmann 97 · 2017 · SC
- CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd.91 citing243 ITR 459 · 2000 · HC
- Mis Yahoo India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), Standard Chartered Bank90 citing307 ITR 59 · 2008 · HC
- 18 Media Pvt. Ltd. v. ADIT (International Taxation)85 citing44 Taxmann.com 1 · 2014 · ITAT
- CIT, TDS v. Vodafone South Ltd.77 citing241 Taxmann 497 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Bharti Airtel v. ITO (TDS)53 citing67 Taxmann.com 223 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Dell International Services (P) Ltd. v. CIT Manu/APJ2002/50 citing305 ITR 37 · 2008 · HC
- Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT47 citing315 ITR 72 · 2009 · HC
- 156-157. (c) N.V. Philips v. Commissioner of Income Tax46 citing172 ITR 521 · 1988 · HC
- Asia Satellite Telecommunication Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CITT44 citing85 ITD 478 · 2003 · ITAT
- DCIT v. PanAmSat International Systems Inc.35 citing9 SOT 100 · 2006 · ITAT
- DCIT v. Panamsat International System Inc.34 citing103 TTJ 861 · 2006 · ITAT
- Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. ACIT32 citing87 Taxmann.com 152 · 2017 · HC
- 172 Taxmann 41825 citing172 Taxmann 418 · 2008
- DIT v. Ericsson25 citing343 ITR 370 · HC
- WIPRO Ltd. v. ITO24 citing86 ITD 407 · 2003 · ITAT
- 307 ITR 59 (AAR), ISHIKAWAJIMA-HARIMA HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD. v. DIT23 citing124 STC 426 · 2001 · HC
- 182 Taxmann 7622 citing182 Taxmann 76 · 2009
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
These are the two appeals filed by assessee for Financial Year 2009-10 relevant to Assessment-Year 2010-11. The first appeal being ITA No.
ITA No. 415/Ind/2014 & 265/Ind/2018 – AY 2010-11 M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. (Formerly M/s Idea Cellular Ltd.)
415/Ind/2014 is directed against revision-order dated 27.03.2014 passed by CIT (TDS), Bhop
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194J
- Mahesh Pulaveni, Adilabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 991/HYD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Shagun Singhal, Ludhiana vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 899/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Competitiveness Mindset Institute (Cmi)… vs CIT Exemption, JaipurITA 112/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
- Competitiveness Mindset Institute (Cmi)… vs CIT Exemption, JaipurITA 1414/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026