Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 1961, Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, Section 139(9) of the Income Tax Act, Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, Section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT (315 ITR 72)

Q: What is Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT authority for?

For a payment to qualify as consideration for the 'use' or 'right to use' property or information, the payer must have control and possession over that right, property, or information. This interpretation is crucial for determining the applicability of Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act.

Q: How many judgments cite Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT?

47 judgments on BharatTax cite Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT (315 ITR 72), spanning 2016 to 2024.

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 111/IND/2015[2013-14 (Quarter 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "ायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 110/Ind/2015 (AY 2013-14 – Quarter-1, 2 & 3 of FY 2012-13) M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., DCIT (TDS), बनाम/ 139-140, Indore. Vs. Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AAACB2100P / TAN: BPLI00953B Assessee by Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv with Shri Gagan Tiwari, Adv Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 31.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement 01.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench…

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 110/IND/2015[2013-14 (for first three quarter)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "ायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 110/Ind/2015 (AY 2013-14 – Quarter-1, 2 & 3 of FY 2012-13) M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., DCIT (TDS), बनाम/ 139-140, Indore. Vs. Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AAACB2100P / TAN: BPLI00953B Assessee by Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv with Shri Gagan Tiwari, Adv Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 31.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement 01.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench…

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

Appeals are allowed

ITA 109/IND/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 194Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "ायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 110/Ind/2015 (AY 2013-14 – Quarter-1, 2 & 3 of FY 2012-13) M/s Idea Cellular Ltd., DCIT (TDS), बनाम/ 139-140, Indore. Vs. Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AAACB2100P / TAN: BPLI00953B Assessee by Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv with Shri Gagan Tiwari, Adv Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 31.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement 01.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

ITA/334/2022HC Delhi24 Jul 2024

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 9

…unications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 332 ITR 340 (Delhi) and the rulings of the Authority for Advance Rulings reported in (2008) 305 ITR 37 (AAR) (Dell International Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., In re and Cable and Wireless Network India P. Ltd., In re (2009) 315 ITR 72 (AAR) on which heavy reliance was made were all rendered prior to the insertion of Explanation 5 and that the decision of the Delhi High Court rested on the facts therein. The amendments by insertion of Explanation 5 gives a very expansive meaning to the term "royalty" and this has a bearing on the issue so too the various clauses in the agre…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

ITA/206/2023HC Delhi24 Jul 2024

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 9

…unications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 332 ITR 340 (Delhi) and the rulings of the Authority for Advance Rulings reported in (2008) 305 ITR 37 (AAR) (Dell International Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., In re and Cable and Wireless Network India P. Ltd., In re (2009) 315 ITR 72 (AAR) on which heavy reliance was made were all rendered prior to the insertion of Explanation 5 and that the decision of the Delhi High Court rested on the facts therein. The amendments by insertion of Explanation 5 gives a very expansive meaning to the term "royalty" and this has a bearing on the issue so too the various clauses in the agre…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

ITA/61/2023HC Delhi24 Jul 2024

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 9

…unications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 332 ITR 340 (Delhi) and the rulings of the Authority for Advance Rulings reported in (2008) 305 ITR 37 (AAR) (Dell International Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., In re and Cable and Wireless Network India P. Ltd., In re (2009) 315 ITR 72 (AAR) on which heavy reliance was made were all rendered prior to the insertion of Explanation 5 and that the decision of the Delhi High Court rested on the facts therein. The amendments by insertion of Explanation 5 gives a very expansive meaning to the term "royalty" and this has a bearing on the issue so too the various clauses in the agre…

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

ITA/55/2023HC Delhi24 Jul 2024

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

Section 9

…unications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 332 ITR 340 (Delhi) and the rulings of the Authority for Advance Rulings reported in (2008) 305 ITR 37 (AAR) (Dell International Services (India) Pvt. Ltd., In re and Cable and Wireless Network India P. Ltd., In re (2009) 315 ITR 72 (AAR) on which heavy reliance was made were all rendered prior to the insertion of Explanation 5 and that the decision of the Delhi High Court rested on the facts therein. The amendments by insertion of Explanation 5 gives a very expansive meaning to the term "royalty" and this has a bearing on the issue so too the various clauses in the agre…

SNC LAVALIN INC.,DELHI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT. TAX 3(1)(2), DELHI

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is allowed, the Stay Application of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 3691/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jun 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Sh. Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Sh. S. K. Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 270ASection 9(1)(vii)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member, Sh. Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member ITA No. 3691/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year: 2021-22 & SA No. 36/Del/2024 : : Asstt. Year: 2021-22 SNC Lavalin Inc., Vs ACIT, A-32, First Floor, Khasra No. 56, International Taxation, Village Amberahi, Sector-19, Circle-3(1)(2), Dwarka, New Delhi-110075 New Delhi-110002 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAKCS5626H Assessee by : Sh. S. K. Aggarwal, CA Revenue by : Sh. Vizay B. Vasanta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 02.04.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 25.06.2024 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Ku…

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. DCIT TDS, INDORE

ITA 265/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Dcit/Jcit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 254(2)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "ायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. CIT (TDS), बनाम/ (Formerly M/s Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. DCIT/JCIT (TDS), बनाम/ (Formerly M/s Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AAACB2100P / TAN: BPLI00953B Assessee by Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advoca…

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE CIT (TDS), BHOPAL

ITA 415/IND/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/S Vodafone Idea Ltd. Dcit/Jcit (Tds), बनाम/ (Formerly M/S Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 194HSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 254(2)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, इंदौर "ायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.M. BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. CIT (TDS), बनाम/ (Formerly M/s Idea Bhopal Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) M/s Vodafone Idea Ltd. DCIT/JCIT (TDS), बनाम/ (Formerly M/s Idea Indore Vs. Cellular Ltd.), 139-140, Electronics Complex, Pardeshipura, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) PAN: AAACB2100P / TAN: BPLI00953B Assessee by Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advoca…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. ORANGE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRANCE TELECOM)), FRANCE

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 711/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(It)A No. 711/Bang/2023 Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Orange The Deputy (Formerly Known As Commissioner Of France Telecom), Income Tax, 78, Rue Olivaier De Circle – 2(2), Serres, International Paris, Taxation, Vs. France. Bengaluru. Pan: Aacco8859J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri D.S. Karthik, Jcit (Dr)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Karthik, JCIT (DR)

Section 14Section 147Section 148Section 201Section 9

…ned. The meaning attached to phrase "use" or "right to use" has been explained in following decisions: • Decision of Authority For Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as AAR), in case of Cable & Wireless Networks India(P.)Ltd., In re, [2009] 182 Taxman 76/315 ITR 72 (New-Delhi) • Decision of AAR in case of ISRO Satellite Centre [ISAC] In re [2008] 175 Taxman 97/307 ITR 59 (New Delhi) • Decision of AAR in case of Dell International Services India (P.) Ltd. In re. [2008] 172 Taxman 418/[2009] 305 ITR 37 (New Delhi). 5.2.11 The above decisions, lay down that, in order to satisfy 'use or right to use', the contro…

COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 32/BANG/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuappeal No. Appellant Respondent It(It)A M/S. Communications Global The Deputy Commissioner Of No.89/Bang/2019 Network Services Limited, Income Tax 81, Newgate Street, London, (International Taxation), Assessment Year : Ec1A 7Aj, Circle – 2(1), 2009-10 United Kingdom. Bengaluru. Pan : Aagcc 9220 K It(It)A The Deputy Commissioner Of Nos.2218/Bang/2019, Income Tax 32/Bang/2021, -Do (International Taxation), 709/Bang/2022, Circle – 2(2), 165 To 167/Bang/2023 Bengaluru. Assessment Years : 2010-11 To 2015-16 Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocates Revenue By : Shri. Aseem Sharma, Cit(Dr), Itat, Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 28.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.08.2023

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri. Aseem Sharma, CIT(DR), ITAT, Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 201Section 5(2)

…r dated 27.04.2016 passed by the Chandigarh Bench of the Hon’ble Tribunal in ITA Nos. 769 to 772/Chd/2013)); - Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. UOI (reported in [2006] 282 ITR 273 (SC)); and - Cable & Wireless Networks India Private Limited (reported in [2009] 315 ITR 72 (Del. AAR)) IT(IT)A Nos. 89, 2218/Bang/2019, 32/Bang/2021, 709/Bang/2022, 165 to 167/Bang/2023 Page 7 of 17  It is submitted that Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act does not in any manner alter the taxability of the receipts in the Assessee’s hands. It is submitted that once the conditions of ‘use of’ or ‘right to use’ are not…

M/S COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/BANG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuappeal No. Appellant Respondent It(It)A M/S. Communications Global The Deputy Commissioner Of No.89/Bang/2019 Network Services Limited, Income Tax 81, Newgate Street, London, (International Taxation), Assessment Year : Ec1A 7Aj, Circle – 2(1), 2009-10 United Kingdom. Bengaluru. Pan : Aagcc 9220 K It(It)A The Deputy Commissioner Of Nos.2218/Bang/2019, Income Tax 32/Bang/2021, -Do (International Taxation), 709/Bang/2022, Circle – 2(2), 165 To 167/Bang/2023 Bengaluru. Assessment Years : 2010-11 To 2015-16 Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocates Revenue By : Shri. Aseem Sharma, Cit(Dr), Itat, Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 28.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.08.2023

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri. Aseem Sharma, CIT(DR), ITAT, Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 201Section 5(2)

…r dated 27.04.2016 passed by the Chandigarh Bench of the Hon’ble Tribunal in ITA Nos. 769 to 772/Chd/2013)); - Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. UOI (reported in [2006] 282 ITR 273 (SC)); and - Cable & Wireless Networks India Private Limited (reported in [2009] 315 ITR 72 (Del. AAR)) IT(IT)A Nos. 89, 2218/Bang/2019, 32/Bang/2021, 709/Bang/2022, 165 to 167/Bang/2023 Page 7 of 17  It is submitted that Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act does not in any manner alter the taxability of the receipts in the Assessee’s hands. It is submitted that once the conditions of ‘use of’ or ‘right to use’ are not…

M/S. COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED,UNITED KINGDOM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE- 2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2218/BANG/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuappeal No. Appellant Respondent It(It)A M/S. Communications Global The Deputy Commissioner Of No.89/Bang/2019 Network Services Limited, Income Tax 81, Newgate Street, London, (International Taxation), Assessment Year : Ec1A 7Aj, Circle – 2(1), 2009-10 United Kingdom. Bengaluru. Pan : Aagcc 9220 K It(It)A The Deputy Commissioner Of Nos.2218/Bang/2019, Income Tax 32/Bang/2021, -Do (International Taxation), 709/Bang/2022, Circle – 2(2), 165 To 167/Bang/2023 Bengaluru. Assessment Years : 2010-11 To 2015-16 Assessee By : Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Advocates Revenue By : Shri. Aseem Sharma, Cit(Dr), Itat, Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 28.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.08.2023

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri. Aseem Sharma, CIT(DR), ITAT, Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 201Section 5(2)

…r dated 27.04.2016 passed by the Chandigarh Bench of the Hon’ble Tribunal in ITA Nos. 769 to 772/Chd/2013)); - Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. UOI (reported in [2006] 282 ITR 273 (SC)); and - Cable & Wireless Networks India Private Limited (reported in [2009] 315 ITR 72 (Del. AAR)) IT(IT)A Nos. 89, 2218/Bang/2019, 32/Bang/2021, 709/Bang/2022, 165 to 167/Bang/2023 Page 7 of 17  It is submitted that Explanations 5 and 6 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act does not in any manner alter the taxability of the receipts in the Assessee’s hands. It is submitted that once the conditions of ‘use of’ or ‘right to use’ are not…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1919/HYD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1918/HYD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1917/HYD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1916/HYD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1915/HYD/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals and cross objections of the assessee for the Asst Years 2002-03 and 2003-04 are allowed and appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1914/HYD/2019[2005-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 May 2022AY 2005-09

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar(CIT-DR)

Section 133ASection 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 9

…was in this context that the AAR opined that it cannot be called as a use of the equipment. Similar views have been taken in the case of Isro Satellite Centre (ISAC), In re (2008) (307 ITR 59) (AAR) and Cable and Wireless Networks India P. Ltd., In re (2009) (315 ITR 72) (AAR). 3.5.13. Attention is also invited to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Another vs. Union of India and Others (2006) (282 ITR 273) (SC). This judgment arose under the Service Tax and Sales Tax wherein one of the questions which arose for consideration was whether there was any transfer of a right…

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT

What is Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT authority for?

Also referred to as

Sections most often in play

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. DCIT 313 ITR 263; Ramond Limited v. DCIT

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE DCIT (TDS), INDORE

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 vs. TELSTRA SINGAPORE PTE LTD.

SNC LAVALIN INC.,DELHI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT. TAX 3(1)(2), DELHI

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. DCIT TDS, INDORE

M/S. IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE CIT (TDS), BHOPAL

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. ORANGE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRANCE TELECOM)), FRANCE

COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

M/S COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

M/S. COMMUNICATIONS GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES LIMITED,UNITED KINGDOM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE- 2(1), BANGALORE

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-14(2), HYDERABAD