CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd.

243 ITR 459High Court2000#1252 most cited

What is CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. authority for?

Consideration received for the outright sale of drawings and designs is generally not taxable in India as income deemed to accrue or arise in India, as it does not fall within the scope of 'fees for technical services' or royalty under Section 9.

91

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. · 243 ITR 459 · Section 9(1)(vii) · Section 9(1) · taxability of drawings designs · sale of drawings · fees for technical services · income deemed to accrue in India · royalty income · Madras High Court · non-resident income

Also reported as

109 Taxmann 369

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)Section 234BSection 144CSection 271(1)(C)Section 148Section 263Section 142(1)

Issues it is cited on

section 9(l)(vii)section 209(1)section 206asection 206aause of equipmentsection 35abbsection 44bbbsection 9(l)section 35ddsection 9(2)section 44bbwaiver of loan

Judgments citing CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd.

RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM USA INC.,TEXAS vs. DCIT (IT) 4 (1) (1), MUMBAI

In the result appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2991/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Apr 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai () & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth ()

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 153Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)

…dem generis or noscitur a sociis, as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Bharti Cellular reported in (2011) 330 ITR 239. 5.2.6 We refer to the decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in case of CIT vs. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd. reported in (2000) 243 ITR 459 wherein Hon’ble High Court observed as under: "10.The term (royalty' normally connotes the payment made to a person who has exclusive right over a thing for allowing another to make use of that thing which may be either physical or intellectual property or thing. The exclusivity of the right in relation to the thing for which royalty is paid shou…

SMS GROUP GMBH,DELHI vs. ACIT.CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 377/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3(1)(2), INTERNATIONAL TXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 993/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE - 3(1)(2) INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3297/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2) INT. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1592/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2), INT. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1591/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri M. S. Nethrapal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

DCIT-5(2)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S VODAFONE IDEA LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 2987/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED (FORMERLY IDEA CELLULAR LTD),MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 2150/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\n\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\n\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\n\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\n\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\n…

DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. IDEA CELLULAR LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 2179/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2013-14
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. IDEA CELLULAR LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 2178/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2011-12
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

IDEA CELLULAR LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 1777/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

IDEA CELLULAR LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 1775/MUM/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2011-12
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

DCIT - 14(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. IDEA CELLULAR LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 5945/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2012-13
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion, Century\nMills Compound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\nVs.\nDCIT-3(2), Mumbai\nRoom No. 608 6th Floor, Aayakar\nBhavan, M. K. Road, Churchgate,\nMumbai - 400 020.\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\nITA No. 2178/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nITA No. 2180/Mum/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)\nITA No.…

IDEA CELLULAR LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT HQ (JUDL.) TO CIT-14, MUMBAI

In the result, the ground no

ITA 5765/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2012-13
Section 250Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI\n\nBEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM\nAND\nSMT. RENU JAUHRI, AM\n\nITA No. 1775/Mum/2018 & Ors. (A.Y. 2011-12 to 2015-16)\nVodafone Idea Limited (formerly Idea Cellular Ltd.)\n\nITA No. 2987/Mum/2019;\n(Assessment Year: 2015-16)\n\nDCIT-5(2)(2), Mumbai\n525, Aayakar Bhavan, 5th Floor, M. K.\nRoad, Mumbai – 400 020.\nM/s. Vodafone Idea Limited\n(Formerly known as M/s. Idea\nCellular Ltd.)\nVs.\n10th Floor, Birla Centurion Mills\nCompound, Pandurang Budhkar\nMarg, Worli, Mumbai – 400030.\n\nPAN/GIR No. AAACB2100P\n(Assessee)\n:\n(Respondent)\n…

SMS MEVAC UK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9738/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2) (INT. TAX.), NEW DELHI

ITA 4044/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS MEVAC UK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 3070/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 7570/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 7569/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

ITA 256/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

…ons of ITAT in the case of the assessee where such receipts for the sale of drawing and designs were not held to be taxable in various Assessment Years c) Decisions of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd (Neyveli), 243 ITR 459. d) Decision of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Mitsui Engineering & Ship Building 259 ITR 248. 9.5 Pursuant to the contractual terms, consideration for sale of drawings and designs is not liable to tax in India as the same does not accrue or arise in India. Even under the provisions of DTAA between India and Germany, the same is not l…

Showing 1–20 of 91 · Page 1 of 5