DCIT CIR 6(1), MUMBAI vs. BRIGGS TRADING CO, P. LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of bad debts needs to be examined on a party-wise basis, and the disallowance under Section 14A should be restricted to investments yielding exempt income. The issue regarding AIR data reconciliation was restored to the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deductions for bad debts and notional interest on investments. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims, and the CIT(A) granted partial relief. The assessee and Revenue appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the bad debt write-offs were allowable under Section 36 and whether disallowance under Section 14A is applicable when no exempt income was earned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing91 Taxmann.com 154 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing378 ITR 33 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing323 ITR 518 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Winsome Textile Industries Ltd.378 citing319 ITR 204 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Calcutta Agency Ltd.164 citing19 ITR 191 · 1951 · SC
- PCIT v. Caraf Builders & Construction (P) Ltd.101 citing101 Taxmann.com 167 · 2019 · HC
- Pr.CIT v. Khyati Realtors (P) Ltd.90 citing141 Taxmann.com 461 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-2 v. Caraf Builders & Constructions (P.) Ltd.71 citing112 Taxmann.com 322 · 2019 · SC
- Mohan Meakin Ltd. v. CIT58 citing11 Taxmann.com 141 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Jackie Shroff v. ACIT, Range 16(1)28 citing101 Taxmann.com 455 · 2019 · ITAT
- CIT v. Tulip Star Hotels Ltd.11 citing11 Taxmann.com 209 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- All Grow Finance and Investment P. Ltd. v. CIT10 citing20 Taxmann.com 260 · 2012 · HC
- PCIT v. Mahindra Engineering and Chemical Products Ltd.5 citing136 Taxmann.com 183 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER OM PRAKA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Metso Outotec India Private Limited, New… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4301/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Ram Charan Mehta, Baran vs Income Tax Officer, BaranITA 1402/JPR/2025[2023-24]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S Rajdeep Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs The Additional Commissioner of Commercial…STA/12/20227 Jul 2026
- Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd., Mehsana vs The Pr. CIT-1, VadodaraITA 220/AHD/2022[2017-18]Status: Disposed12 Jun 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026