Section 14A of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 14A is CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd. (313 ITR 340), cited in 2,114 of the 2,158 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 14A

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,114
citing judgments

When an assessee has sufficient interest-free funds available, and investments are made from mixed funds, it is presumed that the investments are made from the interest-free funds, thus precluding the disallowance of interest expenditure.

CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.
322 ITR 158 · 2010 · Supreme Court
2,080
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income is not automatically leviable if the assessee has made a full disclosure of all particulars and the addition or disallowance arises from a difference of opinion.

Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT
284 ITR 323 · 2006 · Supreme Court
1,842
citing judgments

An assessee cannot raise a new claim or a claim not made in the original or revised return of income for the first time directly before the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings.

Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT
193 ITR 321 · 1992 · Supreme Court
1,689
citing judgments

The principle of consistency dictates that if the facts and circumstances remain unchanged across assessment years, the revenue cannot adopt a divergent or adverse position on an issue that was previously allowed after due deliberation.

Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT
378 ITR 33 · 2015 · High Court
1,562
citing judgments

A disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income cannot be made if the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant previous year.

Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT
402 ITR 640 · 2018 · Supreme Court
1,562
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A is not automatic and requires the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D. Only investments yielding exempt income are considered for disallowance, irrespective of their strategic nature.

S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT
288 ITR 1 · 2007 · Supreme Court
1,449
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds cannot be disallowed merely because the assessee made interest-free advances, provided those advances were made for business purposes and commercial expediency. The Revenue cannot dictate a businessman's commercial decisions, but the assessee bears the onus to prove the business expediency.

CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.
366 ITR 505 · 2014 · High Court
1,261
citing judgments

When an assessee possesses interest-free funds sufficient to cover investments yielding tax-free income, it is presumed that such investments were made from these interest-free funds, precluding disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 14A.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. DCIT
328 ITR 81 · 2010 · High Court
1,164
citing judgments

Rule 8D, for computing disallowance under Section 14A for expenses related to exempt income, applies from Assessment Year 2008-09 onwards; for prior years, a reasonable disallowance must be made. The disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the actual exempt income earned.

CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders
349 ITR 336 · 2012 · High Court
921
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can entertain fresh claims or revised computations of income made by an assessee, even if these were not submitted through a revised return of income.

Judgments on Section 14A

Showing 120 of 2,158 · Page 1 of 108

...