ASST CIT 2(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored certain issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, particularly regarding the computation of interest on refunds and the allowability of provisions for wage revision. Other grounds were decided based on the facts and legal precedents.
What were the facts?
The case involves cross-appeals by the State Bank of India and the Revenue concerning various disallowances and claims made by the bank for Assessment Year 2010-11. The appeals deal with provisions for employee benefits, depreciation, bad debts, and other financial claims.
What were the issues?
The key issues revolve around the allowability of various provisions and claims made by the bank, including those related to employee benefits, bad debts, and depreciation, and the correct computation of interest on refunds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 36(1)(vii),Section 36(1)(viia),Section 43B,Section 40(a)(ia),Section 80-IA,Section 244A,Section 80G,Section 37(1),Section 41(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT1,842 citing157 Taxmann 1 · 2006 · SC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT1,596 citing91 Taxmann.com 154 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing61 Taxmann.com 118 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.1,558 citing367 ITR 466 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing158 Taxmann 74 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.1,344 citing319 ITR 306 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders956 citing23 Taxmann.com 23 · 2012 · HC
- Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT901 citing245 ITR 428 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT568 citing225 ITR 802 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT516 citing347 ITR 272 · 2012 · HC
- South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT508 citing130 Taxmann.com 178 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd.417 citing44 ITR 22 · 2002 · HC
- HDFC Bank Ltd. v. DCIT408 citing383 ITR 529 · 2016 · HC
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing224 ITR 677 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT398 citing334 ITR 341 · 2011 · HC
- Vijaya Bank v. CIT392 citing323 ITR 166 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Rajendra Prasad Moody386 citing115 ITR 519 · 1978 · SC
- Southern Technologies Ltd. v. JCIT353 citing320 ITR 577 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Jai Parabolic Springs Ltd.349 citing306 ITR 42 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Taparia Tools Ltd. v. JCIT343 citing372 ITR 605 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT341 citing37 ITR 1 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT326 citing343 ITR 270 · 2012 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI & SHRI JAGADISH
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench: Present cross-appeals arise out of the order dated 21/03/2017 passed by Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-5, Mumbai I.T.A. No. 3882/Mum/2017
[hereinafter “Ld.CIT(A)”], for Assessment Year 2010-11 on following grounds of appeal:- Assessee’s Appeal: “The appellant objec
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026