GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1), PANAJI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, restoring the issue of management fees to the DRP for fresh adjudication, citing a similar pending issue for an earlier assessment year. The additional ground regarding education cess was withdrawn and dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the Assessing Officer's order concerning the determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for management fees and the applicability of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) rates under a tax treaty. The assessee also raised an additional ground regarding the deduction of education cess.
What were the issues?
Whether the ALP adjustment for management fees was correctly made, and whether the DDT rate under the India-Netherlands tax treaty should be applied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.115 citing149 Taxmann.com 332 · 2023 · ITAT
- Bombay in Colorcon Asia (P.). Ltd. v. JCIT4 citing181 Taxmann.com 301 · 2025 · HC
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्यावपत प्रतत //True Copy// 1.
( Asst. Registrar ITAT, Panaji
| Date | Initial | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Draft dictated on | PS | ||
| 2. | Draft placed before author | PS | ||
| 3. | Draft proposed & placed before the second member | PS | ||
| 4. | Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. | PS | ||
| 5. | Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS | PS | ||
| 6. | Kept for pronouncement on | |||
| 7. | File sent to the Bench Clerk | |||
| 8. | Date on which file goes to the AR | |||
| 9. | Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. | |||
| 10. | Date of dispatch of Order. | |||
| 11. | Dictation Pad is enclosed |
Draft proposed & placed before PS the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by PS Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order. 11. Dictation Pad is enclosed 2. Other M
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026