DCIT 3(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. MAHARASHTRA AIRPORT DEVELOPEMENT CO. LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to raise additional legal grounds. It also held that the Assessing Officer's order giving effect to the ITAT's order was barred by limitation. The Tribunal found no illegality in the CIT(A)'s findings regarding certain disallowances.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd., filed appeals against additions made to its income, including interest on fixed deposits, grant-in-aid, and development charges. The Revenue also filed cross-appeals challenging certain reliefs granted by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer's order giving effect to the ITAT's order was passed within the prescribed time limit. Whether certain receipts like grant-in-aid and development charges are revenue receipts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- Liberty India v. CIT571 citing183 Taxmann 349 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd. v. CIT429 citing228 ITR 253 · 1997 · SC
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing141 Taxmann.com 289 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Sterling Foods311 citing104 Taxmann 204 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- Nirma Industries Ltd. v. DCIT136 citing283 ITR 402 · 2006 · HC
- Triveni Engineering Works Ltd. v. CIT56 citing187 ITR 363 · 1991 · HC
- City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. v. ACIT36 citing25 Taxmann.com 333 · 2012
- CIT v. Ruby Rubber Works Ltd.25 citing178 ITR 181 · 1999 · HC
- CIT v. Pandian Chemicals Ltd.22 citing292 Taxmann 539 · 1998
- CIT v. Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Limited13 citing360 ITR 130 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & MS. PADMAVATHY S
Per Bench: Shri Rushabh Mehta, A.R.
Smt San
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IAB
- Qubix Business Park Private Limited, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8…ITA 2420/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Circle-2, Noida vs Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, NoidaITA 6732/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6541/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6540/DEL/2018[20101-11]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025
- M/S. Seaview Developers Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-23(2), New DelhiITA 5188/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026