M/S. SEAVIEW DEVELOPERS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-23(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that income from food and beverage sales within an SEZ is integral to the SEZ business and eligible for deduction under Section 80IAB. It also held that interest paid on delayed TDS is a business expenditure and its addition as income from other sources was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in developing commercial real estate in an SEZ, claimed deduction under Section 80IAB for income from food and beverage sales. The AO disallowed this, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The assessee also incurred interest expenses on delayed TDS payment, which the AO disallowed and then added back as income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether income from food and beverage sales in an SEZ is eligible for deduction under Section 80IAB, and whether interest on delayed TDS payment is a disallowable business expense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT133 citing201 ITR 684 · 1993 · SC · Read judgment
- Resolve Salvage & Fire India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT19 citing195 ITD 266 · 2022 · ITAT
- Karnataka in CIT v. Velankani Information Systems (P) Ltd.10 citing35 Taxmann.com 1 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Information Technology Park Ltd.6 citing46 Taxmann.com 239 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘F’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M BALAGANESH & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER VIMAL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The appeal of the assessee is against order dated 27.06.2017 of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as “the Ld. CIT(A)”) under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
2 ITA No.5188/Del.2017
(hereinafter referred as “the Act”) arising out of Assessment Order dated 29.12.2016 of the Learned Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 23(2), New Delhi (hereinafter referred as “the Ld. AO”) under Sections 143(3) Act for assessment year 2014-15.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IAB
- Qubix Business Park Private Limited, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8…ITA 2420/PUN/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Circle-2, Noida vs Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, NoidaITA 6732/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6541/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6540/DEL/2018[20101-11]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025
- Munjal Auto Industries Limited, Vadodara… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 271/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026