QUBIX BUSINESS PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 8, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that providing a corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise constitutes an international transaction. It further held that income from such a guarantee is not eligible for deduction under Section 80IAB(10) as it is not part of the SEZ development activity.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 80IAB(10) after providing a corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made an upward adjustment for corporate guarantee fee, deeming it an international transaction not eligible for the deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise is an international transaction and if income from it is eligible for deduction under Section 80IAB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80IAB,Section 92B,Section 92C,Section 244A,Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “C”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2022-23 is directed against the order of Assessing Officer passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) r.w.s.144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’).
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Private limited company primarily engaged in the business of Development, Leasing and Maintenance of commercial Real Estate and related interiors. Return of income for A.Y. 2022-23 filed on 23.10.2023 declaring Nil income
2 Qubix Business Park Private Limited
after claiming deduction u/s.80IAB(10
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IAB
- ACIT, Circle-2, Noida vs Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, NoidaITA 6732/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6541/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025AY 2012-13
- Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Noida vs DCIT, Circle-2, NoidaITA 6540/DEL/2018[20101-11]Status: Disposed12 Dec 2025
- M/S. Seaview Developers Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-23(2), New DelhiITA 5188/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2025AY 2014-15
- Munjal Auto Industries Limited, Vadodara… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 271/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026