METRO TYRES LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-5, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that non-compete fees are not eligible for depreciation as intangible assets. However, rental income from a property should be treated as income from house property, not business income. The assessments made under Section 153A were quashed due to a lack of proper approval under Section 153D.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed depreciation on non-compete fees and treated rental income as business income. The Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation and treated rental income as business income. The assessee also raised an additional ground regarding the validity of approval under Section 153D for assessments made under Section 153A.
What were the issues?
Whether non-compete fees qualify as intangible assets for depreciation, and whether rental income should be taxed as house property or business income. Additionally, the validity of assessments made under Section 153A due to procedural defects in approvals under Section 153D was examined.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 32(1)(ii),Section 24(a),Section 14A,Section 153A,Section 153D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar597 citing163 Taxmann.com 9 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Sapna Gupta591 citing147 Taxmann.com 288 · 2023 · HC
- ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.580 citing454 ITR 312 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd.540 citing24 Taxmann.com 222 · 2012 · SC
- H T Media Ltd. v. PCIT132 citing399 ITR 576 · 2017 · HC
- Sharp Business System v. CIT III53 citing2012 SCC OnLine DEL 5639 · 2012 · Read judgment
- Sharp Business System v. CIT50 citing211 Taxmann.com 576 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. Real Image Tech. (P) Ltd.20 citing120 TTJ 983 · 2009 · ITAT
- Income Tax Officer v. Medicorp Technologies India Ltd.20 citing122 TTJ 394 · 2009 · ITAT
- Serum Institute of India Ltd. v. ACIT13 citing135 ITD 69 · 2011 · ITAT
- ACIT v. GE Plastic India Ltd.11 citing137 ITD 309 · 2012 · ITAT
Heard together (10 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member ITA No. 1031/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Range-6, Nagar, Commercial Complex, New Delhi New Delhi-110009 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACM3394A ITA No. 2266/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 ITA No. 5767/Del/2013 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Circle-6(1) Nagar, Commercial Complex, New Delhi New Delhi-110009 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACM3394A ITA No. 5039/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 ITA No. 5041/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 ITA No. 378/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 ITA No. 379/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 ITA No. 5966/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 ITA No. 4734/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Central Circle-5, Nagar, Commercial Complex, New Delhi New Delhi-110009 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACM3394A
ITA No. 1031/Del/2013 & 10 Others 2 Metro Tyres Ltd. ITA No. 5354/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 ITA No. 4
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(1)(ii)
- Msrdc Sea Link Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4…ITA 3693/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 1(3)(2), MumbaiITA 977/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 1(3)(2), Mumbai vs Tata Communications Ltd, MumbaiITA 830/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Baleshwar Kharagpur Expressway Limited… vs PCIT-6, MumbaiITA 5714/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026