DCIT 1(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed depreciation on goodwill arising from a slump sale acquisition of a business. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, arguing it was not eligible for depreciation. The assessee appealed this decision.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that goodwill is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. It followed the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Smifs Securities Ltd., stating that goodwill arising from a slump sale falls within the scope of 'any other business or commercial rights of similar nature'.
What were the issues?
Whether goodwill arising from a slump sale acquisition is eligible for depreciation under the Income Tax Act. Whether specific explanations related to amalgamation apply to slump sale transactions for depreciation purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई पीठें, म ुंबई INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BENCH: H BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA 830/MUM/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2011-12) DCIT 1(3)(2) TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD R.NO. 540, 5TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVNA, M.K.RD,, - VIDESH SANCHAR BHAVAN, Vs. 400020, MAHARASHTRA M.G. RD, FORT, -400001, MAHARASHTRA अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
PAN of Assessee: AAACV2808C
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented Shri. Ajay Chandra, CIT DR by: प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented Shri. J.D Mistri, Sr. Adv. by: ITA 977/MUM/2016 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2011-12) TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD DCIT 1(3)(2) VIDESH SANCHAR BHAVAN, R.NO. 540, AAYAKAR M.G. RD, FORT,, -400001, Vs. BHAVAN, M.K. RD, MAHARASHTRA -400020, MAHARASHTRA अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
PAN of Assessee: AAACV2808C
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented Shri. J.D Mistri, Sr. Adv. by: प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented Shri. Ajay Chandra, CIT DR by: सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 01-Jul-2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 25/09/2026
ITA 830/MUM/2016 ITA 977/MUM/2016
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(1)(ii)
- Msrdc Sea Link Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4…ITA 3693/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 1(3)(2), MumbaiITA 977/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Baleshwar Kharagpur Expressway Limited… vs PCIT-6, MumbaiITA 5714/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs East Hyderabad Expressway Limited, MumbaiITA 9121/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026