SMS GROUP GMBH (FORMERLY SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the consideration for drawings and designs, integral to equipment supply, was not taxable as Fees for Technical Services but as Business Profits, provided it was inextricably linked to the sale of plant and equipment and not attributable to a Permanent Establishment in India. The levy of Section 234B interest was also addressed based on statutory amendments.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a foreign company, appealed against the taxability of income from supply of equipment, drawings, and designs, and the levy of interest. The core dispute revolved around whether these were business profits or fees for technical services, and the existence of a Permanent Establishment in India.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the characterization of income from supply of drawings and designs as business profits versus fees for technical services, and the determination of a fixed place Permanent Establishment in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 9(1)(vii),Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 234B,Section 263(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sun Engineering Works (P) Ltd.814 citing198 ITR 297 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT394 citing288 ITR 408 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.166 citing291 ITR 482 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Neyveli Lignite Corpn. Ltd.91 citing243 ITR 459 · 2000 · HC
- DIT v. Mitsubishi Corporation61 citing438 ITR 174 · 2021 · SC
- CIT v. Mitsui Engineering and Ship Building32 citing174 CTR 66 · HC
- AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT29 citing267 ITR 209 · 2004 · HC
- CIT v. Mitsui Engineering and Ship Building Co. Ltd.29 citing259 ITR 248 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Andhra Petrochemicals Ltd.25 citing373 ITR 207 · 2015
- CIT v. Klayman Porcelains Ltd.23 citing229 ITR 735 · 1988 · HC
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. DIT/DDIT, M/s. SMS Siemag AG (formerly SMS Demag AG) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/o- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi CA, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi PAN: AADCS1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15
With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. SMS Group GmbH Vs. ACIT/DCIT/JCIT (former known as SMS (Intl. Taxation), Siemsag AG), Circle-3(1)(2), C/o- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi CA, 1A-D, Vandhna Building, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi PAN: AADCS1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2015-16 With Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. SMS Mevac UK Ltd., Vs. ACIT/DCIT/JCIT C/o- Mohinder Puri & Co., (Intl. Taxation), CA, 1A-D, Vandhna Building, Circle-3(1)(2), 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AAMCS7193M (Appellant) (Res
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026