AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT

267 ITR 209High Court2004#4013 most cited

What is AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT authority for?

Payments received separately for drawings and documents related to electrical portions of a mill supply contract are considered fees for technical services when they are not linked to the supply contract.

29

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT · 267 ITR 209 · fees for technical services · drawings and documents · supply contract · German company · electrical portions · payment for services · section 9(1)(vii)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT

AEG Aktiengesellschaft v. CIT (267 ITR 209) — Cited in 29 Judgments | BharatTax