COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. SUN ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3251/1979Supreme Court1992 INSC 25617 September 1992Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: YOGESHWAR DAYAL, A.S. ANAND COMMISSIONER OF INCOME32 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The respondent-assessee filed loss returns for assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) deemed these returns invalid as they were filed beyond the time limit and terminated proceedings, leaving the losses undetermined. These orders became final as the assessee did not appeal. Subsequently, the assessee filed a disclosure petition regarding Hundi loans, leading to a settlement where the assessee became assessable for these disclosed sums for the same assessment years. The ITO initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147(a) to tax this escaped income. The assessee contended that the original losses should be determined and set off against the escaped income. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) allowed this, directing redetermination of losses and carry-forward of unabsorbed losses. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) reversed the AAC's order, holding that the original assessment had attained finality and the losses could not be reviewed in reassessment proceedings.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that in reassessment proceedings under Section 147, an assessee cannot seek a review of concluded items unconnected with the escapement of income for the purpose of computing escaped income. The Court reasoned that the original assessment had attained finality as the assessee had not pursued further appeals after the AAC's order. The items the assessee wished to consider in the reassessment proceedings (i.e., the original losses) were unconnected with the escaped income. Therefore, it was not permissible for the assessee to seek a review or revision of the concluded assessment for the purpose of computing escaped income. The High Court erred in allowing the assessee to reagitate finally concluded assessment proceedings and grant relief for items unconnected with the escapement of income. The appeals were allowed, setting aside the High Court's orders and restoring those of the Tribunal. The Court clarified that the scope of Section 147 is confined to income that has escaped assessment and does not extend to reconsidering generally concluded earlier assessments for matters unrelated to the escaped income.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, in reassessment proceedings under Section 147(a) for computing escaped income, an assessee can seek a review of concluded items unconnected with the escapement of income, specifically to redetermine losses declared in original returns that had attained finality. Assessee's contention: Once reassessment proceedings are initiated, the initial assessment order does not survive for any purpose. The ITO has the power to grant benefits available in the original assessment proceedings while making a fresh assessment. Revenue's contention: The original claim of loss had concluded finally against the assessee. Therefore, this question was not open for review in reassessment proceedings. The ITO, in proceedings under Section 147, could not consider items that had become final in the original assessment and were unconnected with any escapement of income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147(a),Section 148,Section 152(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX v. SUN ENGINEERING WORKS (P) LTD. SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 B [YOGESHWAR DAYAL AND DR. A.S. ANAND, JJ.J Income Tax Act, 1961: Sections 147(a}, 148 and 152(2)-Escapement of income-Rcassess- C ment-Scope of-Whether assessee could seek review of concluded item unconnected with escapement of income and matters attaining finality in original assessment, in computation of escaped income-Assessce filing returns for two assessment years showing loss--fncome Tax Officer treating returns as being beyond time and terminating proceedings-Loss not deter- mined-Subsequently assessee filing disclosure petition showing Hundi D loans-Whether loss shown in original returns to be taken into acc.Junt in reassessment proceedings for computation of escaped income.

Precedents-Supreme Court Judgment-Application of principles laid down therein-To be understood in the light of question before court-Words E and sentences of Judgment not to be divorced from context of the question under consideration.

The respondent-assessee in the two appeals filed the returns of income for the assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62 showing loss. The Income Tax Officer considered both

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147(a)

All 33 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147(a) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →