ACIT, CIRCLE vs. SHEENA INDUSTRIES,,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. M/s Carpet India allowed for re-examination of whether the assessees were direct exporters. Since the assessees had only claimed as supportive manufacturers, the Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the issue afresh.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals challenging the CIT(A)'s orders granting deductions under Section 80HHC and 80IB to the assessees as 'supportive' manufacturers. This was the second round of proceedings following a Supreme Court decision.
What were the issues?
Whether 'supportive' manufacturers are entitled to deductions under Section 80HHC on par with direct exporters, and if the assessees can prove they are also direct exporters.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- (CIT v. Baby Marine Exports68 citing290 ITR 323 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sushil Kumar Gupta4 citing210 Taxmann 257 · 2012 · SC
- CIT v. Carpet India3 citing93 Taxmann.com 434 · 2018
- CIT v. M/s Carpet India3 citing109 Taxmann.com 35 · 2019 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Naveen Chandra
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:
The Revenue has filed it’s identical twin appeals ITA Nos. 1228 & 1229/Del/2006; for assessment years 1999-2000 and 2002-03, in the former assessee M/s Sheena Industries case(s), against the CIT(A), Karnal’s as many years dated 13 & 14.02.2006; respectively. It’s third appeal ITA No. 970/Del/2007 involving M/s Sheena Exports, in assessment year 2003-04, has arisen against the very CIT(A)’s order dated 18.12.2006 in issue. Relevant proceedings in all these cases are u/s 143(3).
Cases called twice. None appears
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80HHC
- Sheena Industries, Panipat vs ACIT Circle, PanipatITA 3076/DEL/2008[2004-2005]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2004-2005
- Sarla Fashion Garments, New Delhi vs JCIT, Range-31, DelhiITA 1799/DEL/2006[2001-2002]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2001-2002
- M/S Vardhman Textiles Ltd vs C I T and AnrITA/517/200826 Feb 2026
- C I T vs M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Helathcare LtdITA/271/20095 Feb 2026
- CIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Hindustan Unilever LtdITA/677/20085 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026