COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. M/S BABY MARINE EXPORTS, KOLLAM

CIVIL APPEAL No. 6146/2005Supreme Court[2007] 4 S.C.R. 62830 March 2007Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ASHOK BHAN, DALVEER BHANDARI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME13 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the export house premium is an integral part of the sale price realized by the assessee from the export house and is includible in the "profits of the business" for computing the deduction under Section 80HHC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court reasoned that the premium is received as consideration for the sale of goods to the export house, as evidenced by the contract. It cannot be considered commission or brokerage, as an assessee cannot earn commission for itself. The Court emphasized that Section 80HHC was incorporated to provide an incentive for earners of foreign exchange and must be interpreted liberally, keeping the legislative intention in view. The Court also clarified that the requirement of realizing sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange applies only to export houses claiming deduction under Section 80HHC(1), not to supporting manufacturers claiming deduction under Section 80HHC(1A). Therefore, the assessee, as a supporting manufacturer, is entitled to claim deduction of the premium amount. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s Baby Marine Exports, Kollam, is engaged in exporting marine products. They sold goods to export houses and received the F.O.B. value plus an export house premium of 2.25% of the F.O.B. value, as per their contract. The assessee treated this premium as part of its turnover and claimed deduction under Section 80HHC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer rejected this claim, considering the premium as commission or service charges. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's claim. The Revenue appealed to the High Court, which dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's decision. The Revenue then filed appeals before the Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the export house premium received by the assessee is includible in the "profits of the business" for computing the deduction under Section 80HHC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (Question of law) Assessee's Contentions: The assessee argued that the export house premium is an integral part of the sale consideration received for the sale of goods to the export house. It is not commission or brokerage, as one cannot earn commission for oneself. The premium is directly linked to the sale of goods and should be included in the business profits for calculating the deduction under Section 80HHC(1A). The assessee relied on the decisions of the ITAT and the High Court which supported their view. Revenue's Contentions: The Revenue contended that the export house premium was a "commission or service charge" for routing exports through export houses who received import licenses. They argued that the premium was unrelated to the export of goods and therefore not eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC. The Revenue relied on the Assessing Officer's interpretation and a decision of the ITAT, Cochin Bench.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80HHC,Section 80HHC(1A),Section 80HHC(1),Section 80HHC(2A),Section 80HHC(1B)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 68 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

A COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX THIRUV ANANTHAPURAM v. MIS BABY MARINE EXPORTS, KOLLAM MARCH 30, 2007 B [ASH OK BHAN AND DAL VEER BHANDARI, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961: , Section BOHHC (JA)-Export house premium:_beduction while c computing total income-Held, permissible.

The short question oflaw involved in the instant appeals was-whether the export house premium received by the assessee is includible in the "profits of the ~usiness" of the assessee while computing tlie deduction under Section D 80HHC of the. Income '.fax Act, 1961. Answering the question in the affirmative and disposing of the appeals, the Court 't· HELD 1.1 The Export House premium is an integral part of the sale E price realized by the assessee from the a;xport house and can be included in the business profit. The assessee thus is entitled to claim deduction of the premium amount in computing the total income. [Paras 26 and 29) (639-A-B, F) CST v. Bangalore Clothing Company, 260 ITR 371; KRN Marine F Exports Ltd. ACIT, (2006) 153 Taxman 437; Sea Pearl Industries v. CIT ,,_ ....

Cochin, (2001) 2 SCC 33; IPCA Laboratory Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner of "'

Income Tax, Mumbai, (2004) 12 SCC 742 and

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 80HHC

All 1,083 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80HHC →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →