PROFESSIONAL AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed appeals for assessment years 2013-14 to 2017-18. For assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20, the appeals were partly allowed, with directions to the AO to re-examine certain claims and make adjustments based on specific figures.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed seven appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14 to 2019-20. The appeals involved issues related to disallowances of toll and trip expenses, repairs and maintenance expenses, and excess brought forward depreciation.
What were the issues?
The main issues were the validity of additions made based on director's statements without corroborative evidence, and the disallowance of business expenses claimed by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing380 ITR 573 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · SC
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing80 Taxmann 89 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT1,061 citing26 ITR 775 · 1954 · SC
- All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT907 citing18 ITR (Trib) 106 · 2012 · ITAT
- McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. CTO741 citing154 ITR 148 · 1985 · SC
- ITO v. Lakhmani Mewal Das721 citing103 ITR 437 · 1976 · SC · Read judgment
- Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala666 citing91 ITR 18 · 1973 · SC
- Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT622 citing124 ITR 1 · 1980 · SC
- Lalchand Bhagat Ambica Ram v. CIT570 citing37 ITR 288 · 1959 · SC
- CIT v. Daulat Ram Rawatmull525 citing87 ITR 349 · 1973 · SC · Read judgment
- Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. v. ITO486 citing106 ITR 1 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Mehta Parikh & Co. v. CIT396 citing30 ITR 181 · 1956 · SC
- Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO384 citing41 ITR 191 · 1961 · SC · Read judgment
- Kachwala Gems v. JCIT332 citing288 ITR 10 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Commissioner of Sales Tax v. H.M. Esufali H.M. Abdulali232 citing90 ITR 271 · 1973 · SC
- Shri Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT225 citing174 Taxmann 466 · 2008 · HC
- Jai Steel (India) v. ACIT224 citing259 CTR 281 · 2013 · HC
- Indian Molasses Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT206 citing37 ITR 66 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. British Paints India Ltd.204 citing188 ITR 44 · 1991 · SC · Read judgment
- Anantharam Veerasinghaiah & Co. v. CIT202 citing123 ITR 457 · 1980 · SC
- ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd.194 citing92 Taxmann.com 361 · 2018 · SC · Read judgment
- 1. S. S. Gadgil v. Lal & Co.158 citing53 ITR 231 · 1964 · SC
- Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT148 citing442 ITR 1 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hotel Meriya139 citing332 ITR 537 · 2011 · HC
- K.M. Sharma v. ITO136 citing122 Taxmann 426 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- B Kishore Kumar v. DCIT135 citing234 Taxmann 771 · 2015 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihyla-@ITA Nos.809 to 815/JP/2025
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
The present bunch of sevenappeals filed by the assessee aggrieved from the seven different order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-4, Jaipur[ for short CIT(A)] for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2019-20 dated 11.04.2025, 08.05.2025, 09.05.2025. The said order of the ld. CIT(A) arise as against the order dated 30.07.2021& 17.08.2021 passed Professional
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026