INDIAN MOLASSES CO. (PRIVATE) LTD. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 395/1957Supreme Court1959 INSC 6105 May 1959Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH23 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The appellant company, The Indian Molasses Co. (Private) Ltd., established a trust on September 16, 1948, to provide a pension for its managing director, H, upon his retirement on September 20, 1955. The company paid Rs. 1,09,643 to the trustees and agreed to pay Rs. 4,364 annually for six years. The trustees were to use these funds to purchase a deferred annuity policy on H's life. The policy, taken out on January 12, 1949, had provisions for surrender value and repayment of premiums if H and his wife died before the option anniversary. The company claimed deductions for these payments for assessment years 1949-50 to 1952-53 under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Income-tax authorities disallowed the claim, stating the sums did not constitute expenditure.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Tribunal held that expenditure deductible under Section 10(2)(xv) must be towards a liability that actually exists at the time of payment. Setting aside money that may become expenditure upon the happening of an event does not constitute expenditure. In this case, the terms of the trust deed and the policy indicated that the money was placed with the trustees to purchase annuities, but it was to be returned if annuities were not bought. The clauses in the policy also showed that the appellant, through the trustees, retained dominion over the premia paid until September 20, 1955. Therefore, the payment was towards a liability that was contingent. Consequently, the amounts claimed were not deductible as expenditure under Section 10(2)(xv). The High Court's decision answering the question in the negative was upheld.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the payments made by the assessee company to the trustees for the purchase of a deferred annuity policy constitute 'expenditure' within the meaning of Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for which a deduction can be claimed. The assessee contended that the payment of pension is an expenditure of a revenue character, and so is the payment of a lump sum to discharge a recurring pension liability. They argued that expenditure on insurance is not contingent because probabilities are actuarially calculated, making the expenditure real. The revenue contended that the sums claimed did not amount to expenditure within the meaning of Section 10(2)(xv).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(2)(xv)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

'959 May 5. 964 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1959] Supp. THE INDIAN MOLASSES CO. (PRIVATE) LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL. (B. P. SINHA, J. L. KAPUR and M. HIDAYATULLAH, JJ.)

Income-tax-Deduction - Business expendit11re-Payment of sums for getting annuities to provide pension-Liability depending on contingency-Expenditure, meaning of-Indian Income-tax Act, z922 (XI of z922), s. Io(2)(xv).

With a view to provide a pension to H who was the manag- ing director of the appellant company, after his retirement at the age of 55 years on September 20, 1955, the company executed a trust deed on September 16, 1948, in favour of three trustees to w horn the company paid a sum of Rs. l,09,643 and further undertook to pay annually Rs. 4,364 for six consecutive years.

The trustees undertook to hold the said sums upon trust to spend the same in taking out a Deferred Annuity Policy with an Insur- ance Society in the name of the trustees but on the life of H under which a certain sum of money was payable annually to H for life from the date of his superannuation. It was also pro- vided in the deed that notwithstanding the main clause the trustees would, if so d

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 10(2)(xv)

All 90 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(2)(xv) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →