K.M. Sharma v. ITO

254 ITR 772Supreme Court of India2002#759 most cited

What is K.M. Sharma v. ITO authority for?

Proceedings that have attained finality under existing law due to a bar of limitation cannot be reopened or revived unless a subsequent amended provision is explicitly given retrospective operation to upset such completed proceedings.

136

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2005 to 2026.

Also referred to as

K.M. Sharma v. ITO · Section 147 · Section 148 · Section 149 · limitation period · reopening assessment · retrospective amendment · finality of assessment · expired limitation · income tax law

Also reported as

122 Taxmann 426

Sections most often in play

Section 147Section 148Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69ASection 149Section 150Section 142(1)

Issues it is cited on

undisclosed foreign income and assetssection 149(1)(c)section 4(2)section 201(3)section 150(1)section 158basection 150section 150(2)unexplained jewellerysection 18section 70section 33(4)

Judgments citing K.M. Sharma v. ITO

VINAY CHAUDHARY,PITAMPURA vs. ACIT INT TAX 1(2)(1), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 3115/DEL/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Apr 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: “Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 54Section 54FSection 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’: NEW DELHI BEFORE “SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3115/Del/2023, A.Y. 2021-22 Vinay Chaudhary ACIT, LU-4, Pitampura, Circle-Int.Tax-1(2)(1), Delhi-110034 Vs. Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002 PAN: AHBPK1445R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Ms. Meenal Goyal, CA & Sh. Kunal Gupta, CA Respondent by Sh. M.S. Nethrapal, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 05/01/2026 Date of Pronouncement 02/04/2026 O R D E R PER RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN , J.M.: This appeal is filed by the appellant/assessee against the final assessment orde…

BEST BULL STOCK TRADING PVT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2954/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. C.N. Prasad & Sh. M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 150Section 150(1)Section 150(2)Section 153(6)Section 153A

…tion 150 ice. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 ie. Time limit for notices under section 148 the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K.M. Sharma v. ITO [2002] 174 TR 210/254 ITR 772/122 Taxman 426 (SC) while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and hereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case de…

BEST BULL STOCK TRADING PVT LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-18, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 2953/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. C.N. Prasad & Sh. M. Balaganesh

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 150Section 150(1)Section 150(2)Section 153(6)Section 153A

…tion 150 ice. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 ie. Time limit for notices under section 148 the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K.M. Sharma v. ITO [2002] 174 TR 210/254 ITR 772/122 Taxman 426 (SC) while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and hereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case de…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 710/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

…pursuance of an order on appeal\nand section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section148 of the Act. While\n\n77\nITA Nos.709/JP/2025\nDCIT vs. Sapna Karnani\ndealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income\nTax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land\nrevenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the\nprovision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal\nand time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify\nthe issue on hand with that of the case decide…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 709/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

…0\ni.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal\nand section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section148 of the Act. While\ndealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income\nTax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land\nrevenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the\nprovision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal\nand time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify\nthe issue on hand with that of the case decide…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. KARNANI SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 480/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: MS. Alka Gautam, CIT
Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 68

…\ni.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal\nand section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section 148 of the Act. While\ndealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income\nTax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land\nrevenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the\nprovision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal\nand time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify\nthe issue on hand with that of the case decide…

SH. MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL,SIKAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result of the appeal of the assessee are disposed off as under

ITA 500/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

…n 150 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices undersection 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decided by…

SH. MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL,SIKAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result of the appeal of the assessee are disposed off as under

ITA 497/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आंकड़ुठरधारी आइटीएए सं.र@ITA Nos.493, 495 to 498, 500/JP/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष@Assessment Years : 2014-15 to 2016-17, 2018-19 to 2020-21 Mahendra Kumar Goyal चुके Vs. ACIT/DCIT Ward No. 2, Shahpura Road Neem Ka Thana, Sikar Central Circle-03, Jaipur लेखा संख्याल्लेय सं.जीआइआर सं.पान@PAN/GIR No.: ACFPG0306G अपीलार्थी@Appellant प्रत्यार्थी@Respondent निर्धारीती की आर से@ Assessee by : Shri P. C. Parwal, CA राजस्व की आर से@ R

For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

…n 150 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices undersection 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decided by…

SH. MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL,SIKAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result of the appeal of the assessee are disposed off as under

ITA 496/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

…n 150 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices undersection 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decided by…

SH. MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL,SIKAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result of the appeal of the assessee are disposed off as under

ITA 493/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

…n 150 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices undersection 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decided by…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. KAMLAPRABHA L/H OF LATE SHRI GOPAL LAL JI GOSWAMI, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross objection of the assessee is disposed off in terms of the observation made herein above

ITA 94/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Aug 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-Sr.DR a
Section 144Section 153C

…ls Pvt. Ltd. (2015) 372 ITR 0684 (Del)  Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India, (2016) 66 taxmann.com 157 (Guj.) 2.5. The law is well settled thattheprovisions prescribing time must be strictly interpreted by the Hon’ble Apex Court in K.M Sharma v. ITO [(2002) 254 ITR 772, 777(SC)], holding that: “Fiscal statute, more particularly a provision such as the present one, regulating period of limitation must receive strict construction. The law of limitation is intended to give certainty and finality to legal proceedings and to avoid exposure to risk of litigation to litigant for indefinite period on future unforeseen…

PROFESSIONAL AUTOMOTIVES PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMMU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 812/JPR/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील /ITA Nos.809 to 815/JP/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Years :2013-14 to 2019-20 Professional Automotives Pvt. बनाम ACIT, Ltd. Bahu Plaza, Bahu Plaza, Jammu Vs. Central Circle- 1, and Kashmir Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं./जी.आई.आर. सं./PAN/GIR No.:AAACP9608E अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्र]त्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by :Shri Tarun Mittal, CA राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT (Th. V.C)

For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT (Th. V.C)
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

…n 150 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices undersection 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decided by…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 302/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VAIBHAV BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue stands dismissed, and the

ITA 301/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

….e. Time limit for notices undersection 54 ITA No. 301 and others /JP/2025 & CO No. 2 and others-JP-2025 DCIT vs. Vaibhav Banka and others 148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case of K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while dealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the reopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit. The relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue on hand with that of the case decide…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 300/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 299/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 298/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 297/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…Time limit for notices under section\n\n54\nITA No. 301 and others /JP/2025 & CO No. 2 and others-JP-2025\nDCIT vs. Vaibhav Banka and others\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 296/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 295/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

…0 i.e. Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of\nan order on appeal and section 149 i.e. Time limit for notices under section\n148 of the Act. While dealing with that provision the apex court in the case\nof K. M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer [122 Taxmann 426 (SC) ] while\ndealing with the judgment of the land revenue case and thereby the\nreopening of the case has in detailed analysis the provision for cases\nwhere assessment is in pursuance of an order of an appeal and time limit.\nThe relevant finding is reproduced in full because this will clarify the issue\non hand with that of the case decid…

Showing 1–20 of 136 · Page 1 of 7