Shri Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT

174 Taxmann 466High Court2008#388 most cited

What is Shri Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT authority for?

Liability cannot be fastened solely on the basis of a self-incriminating sworn statement made during a search, as such statements are not conclusive and require corroborative evidence.

225

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi · Chokshi v CIT · Section 132(4) · Section 153A · self-incriminating sworn statement · admission during search · conclusive evidence · corroborative evidence · addition based solely on statement · search assessment

Sections most often in play

Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 132Section 292CSection 69ASection 115BBESection 153C

Issues it is cited on

section 153b(i)(a)section 132(8)section 132(9a)section 153(1)(a)voluntary admissionsection 145avaluation of sharessection 65bsection 65section 158b(b)section 153(1)dumb documents

Judgments citing Shri Kailashben Manharlal Chokshi v. CIT

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7842/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ BENCH ‘F’ : NEW DELHI BENCH ‘ ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND AND AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, , , , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AC…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI vs. M/S VESTIGE MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, DELHI

ITA 7840/DEL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ BENCH ‘F’ : NEW DELHI BENCH ‘ ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND AND AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, , , , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AC…

VESTIGE MARKETING PVT LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -05 , DELHI

ITA 5521/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Mar 2026AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarabefore Shri Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godarasatbeer Singh Godara & Satbeer Singh Godara & And & Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra, , , Shri Naveen Chandra Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Amit Goel and Shri Pranav Yadav, Advocate
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 37Section 37(1)Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ DELHI DELHI BENCH ‘ BENCH ‘F’ : NEW DELHI BENCH ‘ ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI ’ : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND AND AND SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA, , , , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AC…

SELLAMUTHU KABILAN,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CRICLE 3, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE

ITA 3377/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 Mr. P. Palanisamy, 390, P.P. Nilayam, 9Th Main I Cross, Hal Ii Stage, Indira Nagar, Bengaluru-560 038. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore. [Pan:Adspp 9150 F] (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (प्रयथ/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.219, 220, 221 & 222/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2010-11, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.200, 201 To 208/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2011-12 To 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3388 To 3392/Chny/2024 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2018-19 M/S. P.P. Financers, 24, Radha Avenue, 3Rd Street, Valsaravakkam, Chennai-600 087. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore. [Pan: Aahfp 0288 L] (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (प्रयथ/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.215 To 218 & 223/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19 & 2014-15 Mr. P. Kuppuchamy, No.80/7, 17Th Cross, 16Th Main Road, Btm Layout, Ns Palya, Bangaluru-560 076. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'सी' यायपीठ, चेन्नै। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री मन् कुमार िर, न्यायिक सदस्य एवम् श्री एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.209 to 213 & 214/Chny/2025 िनधारण वष/Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2014-15 & 2016-17 Mr. P. Palanisamy, 390, P.P. Nilayam, 9th Main I Cross, HAL II Stage, Indira Nagar, Bengaluru-560 038. v. The ACIT, Central Circle-3, Coimbato…

PALANISAMY RAGHUPATHY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 3368/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17 Mr. P. Palanisamy, 390, P.P. Nilayam, 9Th Main I Cross, Hal Ii Stage, Indira Nagar, Bengaluru-560 038. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore. [Pan:Adspp 9150 F] (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.219, 220, 221 & 222/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2010-11, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.200, 201 To 208/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2011-12 To 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3388 To 3392/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2018-19 M/S. P.P. Financers, 24, Radha Avenue, 3Rd Street, Valsaravakkam, Chennai-600 087. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore. [Pan: Aahfp 0288 L] (अपीलाथ/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.215 To 218 & 223/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16 To 2018-19 & 2014-15 Mr. P. Kuppuchamy, No.80/7, 17Th Cross, 16Th Main Road, Btm Layout, Ns Palya, Bangaluru-560 076. V. The Acit, Central Circle-3, Coimbatore.

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, ‘सी’ यायपीठ, चेनई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI श्री मनु कुमार गिरी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.209 to 213 & 214/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2014-15 & 2016-17 Mr. P. Palanisamy, 390, P.P. Nilayam, 9th Main I Cross, HAL II Stage, Indira Nagar, Bengaluru-560 038. v. The ACIT, Central Circle-3, C…

JUGALKISHORE BANARASILAL SARAF,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 5059/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain& Hon’Ble Shri Om Prakash Kantjoint Commissioner Of Vs. Jugalkishore Income Tax (Osd), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf House, 802, 8Th Floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Saraf Income Tax (Osd), Central 12-A, Saraf House, Circle 2(1), Mumbai Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Room No. 802, 8Th Floor, Society, N.M.Road, Pratistha Bhavan, Old Cgo J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Annexe, Maharashi Karve Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Revenue By Ms. Kavitha Kaushik,Sr.-Dr.

Section 132Section 250Section 694Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER& HON’BLE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Joint Commissioner of Vs. Jugalkishore income Tax (OSD), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf house, 802, 8th floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-op. Hsg. bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 PAN/GIR No. ANRPS9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Saraf income Tax (OSD), Central 12-A, Saraf house, Circle 2(1), Mumba…

JUGALKISHORE BANARASILAL SARAF,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 5058/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain& Hon’Ble Shri Om Prakash Kantjoint Commissioner Of Vs. Jugalkishore Income Tax (Osd), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf House, 802, 8Th Floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Saraf Income Tax (Osd), Central 12-A, Saraf House, Circle 2(1), Mumbai Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Room No. 802, 8Th Floor, Society, N.M.Road, Pratistha Bhavan, Old Cgo J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Annexe, Maharashi Karve Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Revenue By Ms. Kavitha Kaushik,Sr.-Dr.

Section 132Section 250Section 694Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER& HON’BLE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Joint Commissioner of Vs. Jugalkishore income Tax (OSD), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf house, 802, 8th floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-op. Hsg. bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 PAN/GIR No. ANRPS9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Saraf income Tax (OSD), Central 12-A, Saraf house, Circle 2(1), Mumba…

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. JUGALKISHORE BANARASILAL SARAF, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2431/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain& Hon’Ble Shri Om Prakash Kantjoint Commissioner Of Vs. Jugalkishore Income Tax (Osd), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf House, 802, 8Th Floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Saraf Income Tax (Osd), Central 12-A, Saraf House, Circle 2(1), Mumbai Hatkesh Co-Op. Hsg. Room No. 802, 8Th Floor, Society, N.M.Road, Pratistha Bhavan, Old Cgo J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Annexe, Maharashi Karve Parle, Mumbai- 400056 Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan/Gir No. Anrps9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) Shri. Himanshu Gandhi Revenue By Ms. Kavitha Kaushik,Sr.-Dr.

Section 132Section 250Section 694Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER& HON’BLE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Joint Commissioner of Vs. Jugalkishore income Tax (OSD), Central Banarasilal Saraf Circle 2(1), Mumbai 12-A, Saraf house, 802, 8th floor, Pratistha Hatkesh Co-op. Hsg. bhavan, C.G.O. Building, Society, N.M.Road, Maharashi Karve Road, J.V.P.D Scheme, Vile Mumbai- 400020 Parle, Mumbai- 400056 PAN/GIR No. ANRPS9847D (Applicant) (Respondent) & Jugalkishore Banarasilal Vs. Joint Commissioner of Saraf income Tax (OSD), Central 12-A, Saraf house, Circle 2(1), Mumba…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. AADHITYA FINCORP PVT LTD, CHENNAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 659/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, C.I.TFor Respondent: Ms. N. V. Lakshmi, Advocate
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 153CSection 40A(3)Section 69A

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466(Guj). Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.4.13 App…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CEN CIR 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. PICHANATHA PILLAI RAMESH, COIMBATORE

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 571/CHNY/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, C.I.TFor Respondent: Ms. N. V. Lakshmi, Advocate
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466(Guj). Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.13.2 Fur…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. PICHANATHA PILLAI RAMESH, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 570/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Dec 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri S. R. Raghunatha

For Appellant: Ms. E. Pavuna Sundari, C.I.TFor Respondent: Ms. N. V. Lakshmi, Advocate
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466(Guj). Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.13.2 Fur…

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURA, SURAT vs. PIPODRA TEXTILE PARK LLP, SURAT

ITA 795/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.795/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Acit, Vs. Pipodra Textile Park Llp, S No.85, Vilol. Lindiad, Tal: Central Circle-3, Mangrol, Surat - 395002 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aasfp8206B (Appellant) (Respondent) ""या"ेप सं /Co No.27/Srt/2024 (Ay 2018-19) (A/O Ita No.795/Srt/2024 Pipodra Textile Park Llp Vs. Acit, S No.85, Vilol. Lindiad, Tal: Central Circle-3, Mangrol, Surat– 395 002 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aasfp 8206 B (Co-Objector) (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By Shri Ramesh Malpani, Ca राज"वक" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr & Shri Kevin Langaliya, Ca सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing 03/09/2025 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 31/10/2025

Section 153CSection 250

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.795/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) ACIT, vs. Pipodra Textile Park LLP, S No.85, Vilol. Lindiad, Tal: Central Circle-3, Mangrol, Surat - 395002 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AASFP8206B (Appellant) (Respondent) ""या"ेप सं /CO No.27/SRT/2024 (AY 2018-19) (A/o ITA No.795/SRT/2024 Pipodra Textile Park LLP Vs. ACIT, S No.85, Vilol. Lindiad, Tal: Central Circle-3, Mangrol, Surat– 395 002 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PA…

MAHENDRA SINGH RATNAWAT,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 223/JPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 250Section 37Section 44ASection 69A

…{ "clean_text": "आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर\nIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR\nडा० एस. सीतालक्ष्मी, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री गगन गोयल, लेखा सदस्य, के समक्ष\nBEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JM & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM\n\nआयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 223/JPR/2024\nनिर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19\n\nSh. Mahendra Singh Ratnawat\n53 Golimar Garden,\nSahkar Marg, Bais Godam,\nJaipur.\nबनाम Dy. Commissioner of Income\nVs. Tax,\nCentral Circle-2,\nJaipur.\nस्थायीलेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AFBPR0768Q\nअपीलार्थी / Appellant\nप्रत्यर्थी / Respondent\n\nनिर्धारिती की ओरसे…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. MGN AGRO PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue has been rendered as dismissed, in terms\nof our aforesaid observations

ITA 3759/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Sept 2025AY 2018-19
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 69A

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI\nBEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JM\nAND\nSHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM\nITA No. 3759/Mum/2024\n(Assessment Year: 2018-19)\n\nDeputy Commissioner of Income\nTax, Mumbai\nVs.\nMGN Agro Properties Private\nLimited\n4th Floor, Welspun House, Senapati\nBapat Marg, Lower Parel, Delisle\nRoad, S.O. Mumbai – 400013.\n\nPAN/GIR No. AAGCA6127M\n(Appellant)\n(Respondent)\nAssessee by\n:\nShri Harsh Kapadia a/w. Shri Ajay\nNagpal\nRespondent by\n:\nShri Umashankar Prasad, (CIT DR)\nDate of Hearing\n:\n01.09.2025\nDate of Pronouncement\n:\n03.09.2025\nORDER\nPer Aru…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. NO 1 AUTO FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 658/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

For Appellant: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri.R.Venkata Raman, CA &
Section 132Section 143(3)

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466( Guj) . Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.2.15.1…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. NO 1 AUTO FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 656/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

For Appellant: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri.R.Venkata Raman, CA &
Section 132Section 143(3)

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466( Guj) . Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.2.15.1…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. HELP LINE MOTOR FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 633/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

For Appellant: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri.R.Venkata Raman, CA &
Section 132Section 143(3)

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466( Guj) . Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.2.15.1…

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, TRICHY, TRICHY vs. HELP LINE MOTOR FINANCE, KARUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 622/CHNY/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:656 To 658/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2015-16 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, No.1 Auto Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aahfn 3793 J] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:622 & 633/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Help Line Motor Finance, Central Circle – 2, Vs. No.1, Tam Complex, Nrmp Street, Trichy Covai Road, Karur – 639 002. [Pan:Aaffh 3971 E] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, Cit प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri.R.Venkata Raman, Ca & Shri.R.S.Lakshmi Narayana, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 06.08.2025

For Appellant: Ms.E.Pavuna Sundari, CITFor Respondent: Shri.R.Venkata Raman, CA &
Section 132Section 143(3)

…because it is self-incriminating. Accordingly, it was concluded that no liability could be fastened solely on the basis of sworn statement. In arriving at this decision, the Court followed the judgement in the case of Kailashben Manharlal Choski v. CIT [2010] 174 Taxmann 466( Guj) . Further the Apex Court in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co Ltd v State of Kerala [1973] ITR 18 (SC) has held that an admission is an extremely important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive and further observed that it is open to the person who makes the admission to show that it is incorrect. 6.2.15.1…

ITO 41(3)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. DEEPIKA ANIL AGARWAL, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue stands\ndismissed

ITA 1885/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Aug 2025AY 2011-12
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 147Section 263Section 68

…{ "clean_text": "IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL\n\"D\" BENCH MUMBAI\nBEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER&\nSHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER\nITA No. 1885/Mum/2025\n(Assessment Year: 2011-12)\nVs. Deepika Anil Agarwal\nITO 41(3)(1)\n847, Kautilya Bhawan\nMumbai.\n501, Sidhi Bldg, Mala\nWest.\nPAN/GIR No.AKOPA7202Q\n(Applicant)\n(Respondent)\nAssesseeby\nShri Vimal Punmiya, CA\nRevenue by\nShri Annavaran Kosuri, Sr. AR\nDate of Hearing\nDate of Pronouncement\n22.07.2025\n06.08.2025\nआदेश / ORDER\nPER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM:\nThe present appeal has been filed by the revenue\nchallenging the…

RAJENDRA KUMAR MUNDRA (HUF),MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC), DELHI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1000/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain& Shri Girish Agrawalrajendra Kumar Mundra Vs. Ito, Ward 24(3)(1) (Huf) Piramal Chamber C-28, Ameya Bldg, Behind Lalbaug, Mumbai – Ymca Dn Nagar Andheri (W) 400012. 400053. Pan/Gir No.Aadh6828J (Applicant) (Respondent)

Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 263Section 68Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Rajendra Kumar Mundra Vs. ITO, Ward 24(3)(1) (HUF) Piramal Chamber C-28, Ameya Bldg, Behind Lalbaug, Mumbai – YMCA DN Nagar Andheri (W) 400012. 400053. PAN/GIR No.AADH6828J (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Vimal Punmiya, CA & Shri Anand Mundra, CA Revenue by Shri Annavaran Kosuri, Sr. AR Date of Hearing 22.07.2025 Date of Pronouncement 06.08.2025 आदेश / ORDER PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned…

Showing 1–20 of 225 · Page 1 of 12

...