TH E PADNE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KASARGODE vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, KASARGODE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest earned on deposits with the sub-treasury is attributable to the banking business of the cooperative society and is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
What were the facts?
The assessee, a primary agricultural credit society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2) for interest earned on sub-treasury deposits. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied this deduction, treating it as income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income from sub-treasury deposits is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2) as business income for a cooperative society.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT631 citing384 ITR 490 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State348 citing200 Taxmann 220 · 2011 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Chandra Pooraji, AM & Shri George George K, JM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per George George K., JM
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the consolidated order of the CIT(A) dated 29.06.2017. The relevant assessment years are 2007-2008 and 2013-2014. 2. Since common issue is raised in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed off by this consolidated order. We shall first adjudicate ITA No.584/Coch/2017 concerning assessment year 2007-2008. ITA Nos.584-585/Coch/2017. 2 M/s.The Padne Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. ITA No.584/Coch/2017 : Asst Year 2007-2008
Two issues are raised in ITA No.584/Coch/2017, viz.,
(i) Whether the assessee-society is entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2) of th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)
- The Mrutyunjaya Large Size Co Operative… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PalakolITA 839/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Bank… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2299/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2298/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2018-19
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2297/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Mumbai Vidi Tambakhu Vyapari Sahakari… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2)(2), Piramal…ITA 1801/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 May 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026