Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 80P(4) is Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO (322 ITR 283), cited in 1,283 of the 522 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80P(4)

Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
322 ITR 283 · 2010 · Supreme Court
1,283
citing judgments

The interest income earned by a cooperative society from investing its surplus funds in fixed deposits with banks is not "derived from" its eligible business activities and is taxable as "income from other sources" under Section 56, thus not qualifying for deduction under Section 80P.

Pr. CIT v. Totagars
395 ITR 611 · 2017 · High Court
1,074
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus deposits or investments held with a cooperative bank is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT
431 ITR 1 · 2021 · Supreme Court
981
citing judgments

Section 80P(4) serves as a proviso to Section 80P(1) and (2), excluding only cooperative banks that are cooperative societies and possess an RBI license for banking business. Its purpose is to exclude cooperative banks operating like commercial banks that lend money to the public.

State Bank Of India v. CIT
389 ITR 578 · 2016 · High Court
817
citing judgments

Income arising from a cooperative society's surplus funds invested in short-term deposits and securities is not attributable to the society's core activities and, therefore, is not eligible for exemption under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. v. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society
392 ITR 74 · 2017 · High Court
762
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a cooperative society from its investments or surplus deposits with a cooperative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.
306 ITR 392 · 2008 · Supreme Court
577
citing judgments

The "Purpose Test" determines whether an incentive or subsidy is a capital or revenue receipt for income tax purposes. If the incentive's purpose is to enable an assessee to set up a new industry or make investments in capital assets, it is a capital receipt and not taxable.

Subramanian and Anr. v. Siemens India Ltd. and Anr.
156 ITR 11 · 1985 · High Court
541
citing judgments

When there is a conflict between the decisions of non-jurisdictional High Courts, the view that favors the assessee should be preferred.

Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. v. ITO
230 Taxmann 309 · 2015 · High Court
527
citing judgments

A cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) if it is engaged in cooperative activities. It also clarifies the allowability of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income received from investments made in cooperative banks, after duly considering the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd.

Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO
188 Taxmann 282 · 2010 · Supreme Court
486
citing judgments

Interest income earned by a co-operative society from investments, particularly with co-operative banks, is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P as it is not attributable to the core business activities of the society and constitutes "other income", not "profits and gains of business".

Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. v. ACIT
397 ITR 1 · 2017 · Supreme Court
468
citing judgments

A co-operative credit society engaged in banking business with the general public, accepting deposits from non-members and advancing loans to non-members, is treated as a co-operative bank. Such a society falls under the exclusionary clause of Section 80P(4) and is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Judgments on Section 80P(4)

RAMCHANDRADADA KAWADE PUNYA NAGARI NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,PUNE vs. ITO 7(1), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 379/PUN/2026[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Apr 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judicialmember I T A. No..379/Pun/2026 (A.Y.2017-18) Vs Ramchandradadakawade I.T.O.Ward 7(1), Punyanagarinagarisahakrai Aayakarsadan, . Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Bodhi Tower, S.No.66 Media Park, 548/2B, B T Kawade Road., Salasbury Park, Ghorpadi, Pune -411011 Pune-411037, Maharashtra. Maharashtra. Pan.No.Aaaap5734H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assesseeby Shri.Rajendrakadrekar&Siddheshwarhadi,Ar Revenue By Shri.Amitbobde, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 08.04.2026 17.04.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec143(3)R.W.S 263 & 250 Of The Act. The Assesse Has Raised The Grounds Of Appeal Challenging The Order Of The Nfac/Cit(A) Sustaining The Denial Of Claim Of Deduction U/Sec 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Act & Without Prejudice To Alternate/Obtaining Relief On Interest Income Earned On Deposits With The Co-Operative Banks. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That, The Assessee Is A Co- Operative Society Registered Under Maharashtra Societies

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80

Showing 120 of 522 · Page 1 of 27

...