MARIGOLD MERIDIAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD-41(2)(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT noted that the CIT(A) had not properly considered the evidence and submissions, and that the issue of deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) is debatable. The Tribunal also observed that the reliance on Totagar's case might be misplaced as it pertained to a different subsection. The revenue's counsel had no objection to the matter being set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative housing society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for AY 2021-22 on interest earned from deposits with cooperative banks. The CPC disallowed this deduction, and the CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, citing Section 80P(4) and the Supreme Court decision in Totagar's case. The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative housing society from deposits with cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), and whether Section 80P(4) and the decision in Totagar's case preclude such a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80P(4),Section 250,Section 143(1)(a)(ii),Section 154,Section 156,Section 220(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In Kaliandas Udyag Bhavan Premises Co-op Society Ltd. v. ITO130 citing94 Taxmann.com 15 · 2018 · ITAT
Before: SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH
PER BIJYANANDA PRUSETH, AM:
These three appeals filed by the assessee emanate from the orders passed
under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘Act’), all dated
2025, by the Addl/JCIT Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2,
Coimbatore [in short, ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment years (AY) 2018-19, 2020-21
and 2021-22. Since facts and grounds for three appeals are similar, with the consent of both parties, the appeals were clubbed and heard together and a (AY 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22) Marigold Meridian Co-operative Housing Society Limited
common order is
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026