SURATHKAL VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA,MANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), MANGALORE
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed part of the deduction, citing the Apex Court's decision in Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. and the assessee's dealings with members and non-members, including nominal members.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. judgment was not applicable as the assessee was registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, not the Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies Act. It also considered the nature of interest income from investments in co-operative banks and mandatory deposits with BESCOM.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the eligibility of the co-operative society for deduction under Section 80P(2) in light of the Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. judgment and the AO's findings on dealings with members and non-members, as well as the taxability of interest income from investments and mandatory deposits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K.
PER SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
These are the appeals filed by the assessee challenging the separate orders of the NFAC, Delhi all dated 14/08/2025 in respect of the A.Ys. 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2020-21. The appeal related to the assessment year 2017-18 is taken as a lead case since the issues are common in all the three years and therefore the facts of the assessment year 2017-18 is given as ITA Nos. 2297 to 2299/Bang/2025 follows. The decision arrived in appeal ITA No.2297/Bang/2025 would mutatis mutandis apply to the other assessment years.
The brief facts of the ca
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80P(2)
- The Mrutyunjaya Large Size Co Operative… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PalakolITA 839/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed24 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Bank… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2299/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2020-21
- Surathkal Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Sangha… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), MangaloreITA 2297/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed11 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Mumbai Vidi Tambakhu Vyapari Sahakari… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 22(2)(2), Piramal…ITA 1801/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 May 2026AY 2014-15
- Belda Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd… vs I.T.O., Ward - 39(1), MidnapurITA 3000/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: Disposed5 May 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026