BSC C&C KURALI TOLL ROAD LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the right to collect toll fees is an intangible commercial right eligible for depreciation at 25% under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The provision for major maintenance expenses was also allowed as it was in accordance with settled principles of law.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed depreciation at 25% on a toll road developed on a BOOT basis, treating it as an intangible asset. The Assessing Officer restricted depreciation to 10%, considering the road as a building or plant. The assessee also claimed a deduction for provision made for major maintenance expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether the right to collect toll is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation at 25%, and whether a provision for major maintenance expenses is allowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT901 citing245 ITR 428 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- Metal Box Co. of India Ltd. v. Their Workmen276 citing73 ITR 53 · 1969 · SC
- Indian Molasses Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT206 citing37 ITR 66 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- Techno Shares and Stocks Ltd. v. CIT130 citing327 ITR 323 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hewlett Packard India37 citing314 ITR 55 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Noida Toll Bridger Co. Ltd.13 citing213 Taxmann 333 · 2013 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, JM :
Both appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-
13 & 2013-14 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-35, New
Delhi both dated 02.02.2017. 2. Both appeals were taken up together and being disposed of by way
of a consolidated order. First we take up ITA No.1592/Del/2017
relating to Assessment Year 2012-13 wherein the assessee has raised
following grounds of appeal:-
“That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT (Appeals) has erred while confirming the reduction of depreciation on Toll Road developed by the appellant company from 25% to 10% and confirming addition of Rs.70,58,54,074/- (
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32(1)(ii)
- Msrdc Sea Link Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -4…ITA 3693/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT 1(3)(2), MumbaiITA 977/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 1(3)(2), Mumbai vs Tata Communications Ltd, MumbaiITA 830/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Baleshwar Kharagpur Expressway Limited… vs PCIT-6, MumbaiITA 5714/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Bank of India, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, MumbaiITA 2810/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026