BSC C&C KURALI TOLL ROAD LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 1592/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 May 2021AY 2012-1324 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the right to collect toll fees is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation at 25%. It also allowed the provision for major maintenance expenses as it was in accordance with settled legal principles.

What were the facts?

The assessee company claimed depreciation at 25% on a toll road developed on a BOOT basis, treating it as an intangible asset. The Assessing Officer restricted depreciation to 10%, considering the road as a building or plant. The assessee also claimed a deduction for provision made for major maintenance expenses.

What were the issues?

Whether the right to collect toll is an intangible asset eligible for higher depreciation, and whether provision for major maintenance is allowable.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 32(1)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “A” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI KUL BHARAT

Hearing: 30.03.2021Pronounced: 18.05.2021

PER KUL BHARAT, JM :

Both appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-

13 & 2013-14 are directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-35, New

Delhi both dated 02.02.2017. 2. Both appeals were taken up together and being disposed of by way

of a consolidated order. First we take up ITA No.1592/Del/2017

relating to Assessment Year 2012-13 wherein the assessee has raised

following grounds of appeal:-

1.

“That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned CIT (Appeals) has erred while confirming the reduction of depreciation on Toll Road developed by the appellant company from 25% to 10% and confirming addition of Rs.70,58,54,074/- (

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 32(1)(ii)

All 565 judgments and leading authorities on Section 32(1)(ii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →