NAVIN FLURINE INTERNATIONAL,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT 7(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the sale of carbon credit is a capital receipt and not business income, following previous High Court and Tribunal decisions. Consequently, additions made by the AO on this ground were not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a revised return of income, which the Assessing Officer (AO) rejected. The AO made additions on various grounds including disallowance under Section 14A, addition on account of unmoved creditors, and taxability of carbon credit sale. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the income from the sale of carbon credits is a capital receipt or business income, and the applicability of Section 14A disallowances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 41(1),Section 115JB,Section 35(2AB),Section 115BBG
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.789 citing82 Taxmann.com 415 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Claris Lifesciences Ltd.196 citing174 Taxmann 113 · 2010 · HC
- CIT v. My Home Power Ltd.123 citing365 ITR 82 · 2014 · HC
- Banco Products (India) Ltd. v. DCIT36 citing95 Taxmann.com 132 · 2018 · HC · Read judgment
- Birla Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT34 citing37 ITR (Trib) 644 · 2015 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.26 citing79 Taxmann.com 411 · 2017 · HC
- Delhi in CIT v. Sandan Vikas (India) Ltd.21 citing22 Taxmann.com 19 · 2012 · HC
- Ltd. v. CIT (203 Taxman 364) (Del HC) CIT v. Hero Cycle Ld. (323 ITR 518) (P&H) CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. (15 citing73 DTR 233 · 2012 · HC
- Advance Enzyme Technologies P Ltd. v. ACIT5 citing116 Taxmann.com 498 · 2002 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M:
These four appeals, out of two by assessee and two by Revenue are directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, Mumbai [for short ‘CIT (A)’] vide common orders dated 26.08.2019 for the Assessment Years (AY) 2012-13 & 201
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026