Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.

79 Taxmann.com 411High Court2017#4551 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd. authority for?

Additional depreciation is allowable for assets purchased and put to use for less than 180 days in the preceding assessment year.

26

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT vs. T.P. Textiles Private Limited · 79 Taxmann.com 411 · additional depreciation · section 32(1)(iia) · less than 180 days · purchased and put to use · depreciation allowance

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd.

TRIMAX SANDS P LTD,CHENNAI vs. PCIT, CHENNAI

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 252/CHNY/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.252/Chny/2021 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S.Trimex Sands Private Limited Pr. Cit बनाम 1, Subbaraya Avenue Trimex Towers Chennai-3, C.P.Ramaswamy Road, Alwarpet, Chennai. / Vs. Chennai-600 018. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aabce-3846-Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri D. Anand (Advocate)-Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal (Jcit)- Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 11-07-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 07-08-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri D. Anand (Advocate)-Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal (JCIT)- Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 2Section 263Section 263oSection 32(1)(ii)Section 32ASection 33A

…ons was always to incentivize the investment in plant and machinery in the manufacturing and power 4 sector. Reliance was placed on various decisions including the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of CIT vs. T.P. Textiles Private Limited (79 Taxmann.com 411), wherein the balance additional depreciation was allowed for AY 2011-12. On the issue of disallowance u/s 14A, the assessee relied in various decisions to submit that in the absence of any exempt income, the provisions of Sec.14A could not be invoked. 6. However, Ld. Pr. CIT distinguished the case of Sesa Goa Ltd. (supra) on the ground th…

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-1), KOLKATA vs. RAMKRISHNA FORGING LTD

ITAT/49/2020HC Calcutta27 Jul 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 27Th July, 2022 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv., ….For Appellant Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : This Appeal Filed By Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 13Th February 2019 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “A” Bench, Kolkata In I.T.(Ss).A. No. 09 (Kol) Of 2017 Relating To The A.Y. 2010-2011.. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration :- (I) Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Provision For Allowing Additional Depreciation Of Remaining 50% Is Allowable In The Subsequent Year I.E. Assessment Year 2010-11, Although The Statute Allowed The Same W.E.F. 01.04.2016 ? (Ii) Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Erred On Facts By Not Appreciating The Legal Provisions That Disallowance Of The Claim Of The Remaining Additional

Section 260ASection 32(1)(iia)

…OD - 8 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/49/2020 IA NO: GA/2/2020 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL – 1, KOLKATA VS. RAMKRISHNA FORGING LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK Date : 27th July, 2022 Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv., ….for appellant Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv. Ms. Swapna Das, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv. …for respondent The Court : This appeal filed by revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 13th February 2019 passed by the In…

Showing 120 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madurai v. T P Textiles (P) Ltd. (79 Taxmann.com 411) — Cited in 26 Judgments | BharatTax