Ltd. v. CIT (203 Taxman 364) (Del HC) CIT v. Hero Cycle Ld. (323 ITR 518) (P&H) CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. (

73 DTR 233High Court2012#7500 most cited

What is Ltd. v. CIT (203 Taxman 364) (Del HC) CIT v. Hero Cycle Ld. (323 ITR 518) (P&H) CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. ( authority for?

Additional depreciation on machinery installed in a preceding year is an allowable claim. Balance additional depreciation for machinery installed in a preceding year must be allowed.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. SIL Investments · section 32(1)(iia) · additional depreciation · balance additional depreciation · machinery installed · preceding year · allowance · deletion of addition

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Ltd. v. CIT (203 Taxman 364) (Del HC) CIT v. Hero Cycle Ld. (323 ITR 518) (P&H) CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. (

Ltd. v. CIT (203 Taxman 364) (Del HC) CIT v. Hero Cycle Ld. (323 ITR 518) (P&H) CIT v. UTI Bank Ltd. ( (73 DTR 233) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax