COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S EXCEL INDUSTRIES LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 125/2013Supreme Court[2013] 10 S.C.R. 49008 October 2013Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: RAJENDRA MAL LODHA, MADAN B. LOKUR, KURIAN JOSEPH B14 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that income tax cannot be levied on hypothetical income. Income accrues when it becomes due and is accompanied by a corresponding liability of the other party to pay. The benefits under the advance licence and duty entitlement pass book represent, at best, hypothetical income which may or may not materialize until the goods are actually imported and made available for clearance. Therefore, Section 28(iv) of the Act was inapplicable. The Court noted that the assessee had made imports and paid tax on the benefits in subsequent years, and the rate of tax remained the same, making the Revenue's dispute academic. The Court also emphasized the principle of consistency and avoiding flip-flopping in litigation, especially when a consistent view had been taken in favour of the assessee for multiple assessment years. The appeals were dismissed.

What were the facts?

The appeals before the Supreme Court concerned the taxability of 'advance licence benefit' and 'duty entitlement pass book benefit' under the import-export policy. The assessee, M/s Excel Industries Ltd., maintained accounts on a mercantile basis. For the Assessment Year 2001-02, the assessee claimed deductions for these benefits, arguing they were not taxable until the duty-free raw materials were actually imported and consumed. The Revenue contended that these benefits constituted income in the year of receipt, taxable under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Supreme Court considered multiple appeals arising from similar disputes over various assessment years.

What were the issues?

1. Whether 'advance licence benefit' and 'duty entitlement pass book benefit' are taxable in the year of receipt or the year of utilization by the assessee, under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? The Assessee's contentions: - The benefits represent hypothetical income until the goods are actually imported and made available for clearance. - Income accrues only when it becomes due and is accompanied by a corresponding liability of the other party to pay. - Relied on decisions from the ITAT and High Courts that consistently held such benefits not to be real income until utilized. The Revenue's contentions: - In view of Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, the value of the benefit obtained by the assessee is its income and liable to tax under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession'.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 28(iv)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 935 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

A B [2013] 10 S.C.R. 490 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. MIS EXCEL INDUSTRIES LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 125 of 2013 etc.) OCTOBER 8, 2013 [R.M. LODHA, MADAN B. LOKUR AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1961 - s.28(iv) - 'Advance licence C benefit' and 'duty entitlement pass book benefit' under import export policy - Taxability of - relevant assessment year - Whether the year of receipt of benefit or the year in which such benefits are actually utilized - Held: Income becomes taxable when it is accrued - Income tax cannot be levied on D hypothetical income - Income can be said to have accrued when it becomes due and is accompanied by a corresponding liability of the other party to pay the amount - The benefits in the present case could be hypothetical income until the goods are actually imported and made available for clearance - E Hence, assessment of the assessee u/s.28(iv) in the facts of the present case, not correct.

The question for consideration in the present appeals was whether 'advance license benefit and 'duty entitlement pass book benefit' are taxable in the year in F which they are actually utilised by the assessee and not in the year of receipt.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 28(iv)

All 479 judgments and leading authorities on Section 28(iv) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →