JCIT(OSD), RANGE-10, ITO C.R. BUILDING vs. GEM AGROFOODS PVT. LTD., SHANTI NIKETAN
What were the facts?
The assessee received an exclusivity fee of Rs. 12,74,15,684/- from a foreign company for refraining from negotiating with other parties for a potential joint venture. The Assessing Officer treated this fee as revenue receipt, while the assessee claimed it as a capital receipt.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the exclusivity fee received by the assessee was a capital receipt and not taxable as revenue. The fee was paid for securing exclusivity in negotiations and not for refraining from business activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the exclusivity fee received by the assessee is a revenue or capital receipt, and whether it is taxable under Section 28(iv) or 28(va) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, दिल्ली पीठें, नई दिल्ली INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI BENCH: E BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA 1227/DEL/2025 निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2014-15) JCIT(O ), RANGE-10 GEM AGROFOODS PVT. LTD. ROOM NO 405, 4TH FLOOR, C.R. 3/38 (ANNEXE) , SHANTI BUILDING ITO I.P. ESTATE, NEW NIKETAN, NEW DELHI 110021 Vs. DELHI -110002, NEW DELHI- ,DELHI 110002, DELHI NEW DELHI-110002, DELHI अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AAACG2314E
अपीलधर्थी द्वारा/Appellant represented by: Ms.Lalita Kumari,CIT DR. प्रत्यर्थी द्वारा/Respondent represented by: Ms.Aditi Gupta,Adv. & Sh.Abdulha,Adv.
CO 50/Del/.2026 ( In ITA 1227/DEL/2025) निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2014-15) JCIT(O ), RANGE-10 GEM AGROFOODS PVT. LTD. ROOM NO 405, 4TH FLOOR, C.R. 3/38 (ANNEXE) , SHANTI BUILDING ITO I.P. ESTATE, NEW NIKETAN, NEW DELHI 110021 Vs. DELHI -110002, NEW DELHI- ,DELHI 110002, DELHI NEW DELHI-110002, DELHI अपीलधर्थी Appellant प्रत्यर्थी Respondent
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 02-Jul-2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 21st -August-2026
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 28(iv)
- Bharat Cottage Industries, Mumbai vs Circle 41(4)(1), MumbaiITA 2904/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Marvel Infrabuild Private Limited, Kadugodi… vs ITO, Ward-4(1)(3), BangaloreITA 2206/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Lotus Refineries Private Limited, Chandigarh vs ACIT, ChandigarhITA 450/CHANDI/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT Circle Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar vs Rajena Agro Products Private Limited, PatanITA 2096/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
- Poonam Aggarwal, Paonta Sahib vs Income Tax Officer Nahan, NahanITA 327/CHANDI/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaik Mohammed Abdul Jabbar vs. The Principal Commissioner/CommissionerTelangana · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The Additional CT And GST Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Jagadish Prasad Agrawala vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Shree Jagannath Engineering Co.,Kendujhar vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST And Customs, KeonjharOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Gagan Kumar Das vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026