DCIT CIRCLE GANDHINAGAR, GANDHINAGAR vs. RAJENA AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED, PATAN
What were the facts?
The assessee company obtained loans from a bank and later settled the dues under a One Time Settlement Scheme. The bank waived a significant amount of interest and principal. The Assessing Officer treated the waived amounts as income, while the CIT(A) deleted the addition for the principal waiver and remanded the interest waiver for verification.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the waiver of principal amount is not taxable under Section 28(iv) as it was a monetary benefit and not a perquisite in kind, following Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The Tribunal also affirmed the CIT(A)'s deletion of interest waiver that was already accounted for in the P&L, but remanded the specific interest waiver of Rs. 56,23,724 for verification.
What were the issues?
Whether waiver of principal loan amount is taxable as business income under Section 28(iv) and whether waiver of interest is taxable under Section 41(1) if not offered to tax.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH
Before: Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha & Shri Tapas Ram Misra
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER TAPAS RAM MISRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The captioned appeal by the Revenue and the corresponding Cross Objection by the Assessee have been preferred against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
I.T.A No. 2096/Ahd/2026 & C.O. No. 55-Ahd-2026
National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”), dated 16.03.2026 passed under Section 250 of t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 41(1)
- Morlidhar B Vamdote, Bardoli vs ITO, Ward-1, BardoliITA 1174/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Deuty Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi vs Maharaja Agarsain Builders Private Limited…ITA 3797/DEL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Maharaja Agarsain Builders Private Limited…ITA 3796/DEL/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Classic International, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 29(1), KolkataITA 2610/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
- M/S. Grain Processing Industries (India)… vs ITO, Ward 12(2), KolkataITA 3282/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-2017
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Chandan Patra, Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Corbett Kyari Jungle Resort vs. The State Tax OfficerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S N B Enterprises vs. The Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Sumit Bhoora vs. M/ S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Jayesh Patel vs. M/S Aasharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026