C.I.T-II vs. M/S KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-II (Revenue) against M/s. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti (Assessee). The Assessee is a Market Committee registered under the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964. Its income is derived from market fees, development cess, and licence fees. The core issue revolves around whether amounts transferred by the Assessee (Mandi Samiti) to the Mandi Parishad constitute application of income for charitable purposes under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee is registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the advancement of an object of general public utility. The Assessing Officer had denied exemption, arguing the contributions were not voluntary. The High Court had ruled in favour of the Assessee.
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that the amounts statutorily transferred by the Mandi Samiti to the Mandi Parishad constituted an application of income for charitable purposes under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court reasoned that the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, mandates the utilization of funds for specific purposes, including providing facilities to agriculturists, producers, and market fee payers, and for the development of market yards. These activities fall within the ambit of an object of general public utility as defined under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court clarified that the issue was about the application of income under Section 11(1)(a), and not about voluntary contributions under Section 11(1)(d) or Section 12(1), thus finding no merit in the Assessing Officer's reasoning. The Court affirmed that the Assessee satisfied the conditions of Section 11(1)(a) and saw no reason to interfere with the High Court's judgment.
What were the issues?
1. Whether amounts transferred by the assessee (Mandi Samiti) to the Mandi Parishad constitute application of income for charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Assessee's Contention: The Assessee argued that its activities fall under the advancement of an object of general public utility as defined in Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It contended that the statutory obligations under the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, for utilizing funds for market development and providing facilities to agriculturists and producers amount to application of income for charitable purposes. The Assessee also argued that the Assessing Officer erred in invoking Section 12(1) as the issue pertains to application of income under Section 11(1)(a), not voluntary contributions. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue, through the Assessing Officer, contended that the Assessee was not entitled to exemption under Section 12(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, because the contributions to the Mandi Parishad were statutorily mandated and not voluntary. The Assessing Officer believed that the absence of voluntary contribution negated the benefit of exemption.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11(1)(a),Section 11(1)(d),Section 12(1),Section 12AA,Section 2(15),Section 10(20),Section 10(29)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Page 1 JUDGMENT 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION CIVIL
APPEAL
NO.7040
OF 2012
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.20186 of 2010) Commissioner of Income Tax-II ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti ...Respondent(s) W I T H
Civil
Appeal
No.7041/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.20187
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7042/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.24153
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.
7044/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.28056
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7045/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.29319
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7046/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.26135
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7047/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.30949
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7048/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.31204
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7049/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.33083
of 2010,
Civil
Appeal
No.7050/2012
@ S.L.P.
(C) No.224
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(1)(a)
- Sri Vidyanikethan Educational Trust… vs DCIT Exemption Cir, VijayawadaITA 412/VIZ/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Porwal Charitable Trust, Thane vs The Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward…ITA 7604/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- Jain Citizen Education Society, Surendra… vs ITO, Ward-2, Exmp, AhmedabadITA 737/AHD/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Vanita Samaj, Mumbai vs Jurisdiction Exem Ward 2(4), MumbaiITA 8116/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026