JAIN CITIZEN EDUCATION SOCIETY,SURENDRA NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-2, EXMP, AHMEDABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee, an educational trust, claimed exemption under Section 11 and sought to accumulate 15% of its income. The tax authorities denied the benefit of accumulation, citing the belated filing of Form No. 10 and Form No. 10BB.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Form No. 10 was filed before the extended due date for filing the return of income, making the accumulation claim valid. It also ruled that the substantive claim for exemption could not be denied due to procedural delay in filing the audit report (Form 10BB) when it was available before the completion of proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of exemption for accumulation of income is justified due to alleged belated filing of Form 10 and Form 10BB, and if substantive exemption can be denied for procedural lapses.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(23C),Section 11,Section 11(1)(a),Section 11(2),Section 139(1),Section 143(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
-
This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 14.01.2026 passed by the Ld. Addl/JCIT (A)-4, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT (A)’ in short), under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ in short) for Assessment Year 2023-24. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “Ground 1: Disallowance of accumulation of 15 per cent application of funds amounting to Rs. 43,89,286/- in terms of third proviso to section 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 The Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, has erred in law and on facts in confirming the disallowa
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(23C)
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Neuro Spinal Services and Research Society… vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption…ITA 1601/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
- Samudayik Kendra Subhash Nagar Prabhand… vs Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, JaipurITA 1440/JPR/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2027-28
- Midnapore College, West Midnapore vs I.T.O., Ward - 38(1), Paschim MidnaporeITA 2409/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-2017
- Midnapore College, West Midnapore vs I.T.O., Ward - 38(1), Paschim MedinapurITA 2408/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2016-2017
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajlaxmi Agro Food Product Private Limited And Anr. vs. The Superint., CGST And Cx, Berhampore Range, Berhampore Division, Bolpur Commiss. And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shibsankar Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Alkem Laboratories Limited vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise, RaigadBombay · 6 Oct 2026
- Axis Bank LTD vs. State Of Maharashtra Thru. G P And AnrBombay · 6 Oct 2026