VANITA SAMAJ,MUMBAI vs. JURISDICTION EXEM WARD 2(4), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, had its exemption under Section 11 denied by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) due to alleged commercial activities and issues with Form 10. The denial was based on the proviso to Section 2(15) and Section 13(8) of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 11, particularly for accumulation of income under Section 11(2). It found that the subsequent conduct of the assessee corroborated the bona fide character of the accumulation, and inconsistencies in Form 10 were not fatal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activities constituted business, thereby attracting the proviso to Section 2(15) and disentitling it from Section 11 exemption, and whether the conditions for accumulation of income under Section 11(2) were met.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 2(15),Section 13(8),Section 11(1)(a),Section 11(2),Section 11(3),Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER: MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM
These three appeals by the assessee are directed against three separate orders, all dated 12.09.2025, passed by the learned Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Chennai [hereinafter referred to as "the CIT(A)"], under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”], for the assessment years 2013-14, 2016-17 and 2017-
The impugned appellate orders arise from assessments completed under section 143(3) of the Act by the Income Tax Officer, Exemption W
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8697/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- Anantaru Foundation, Mumbai vs CIT (Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8696/MUM/2026[NA]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2367/KOL/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- M/S. Development Education & Welfare Trust… vs I.T.O., Ward - 2(3), AlipurduarITA 2366/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026