ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. APAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the assessee's grounds related to Section 32AC to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The Revenue's appeal regarding Section 14A disallowance was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)'s view that disallowance cannot exceed exempt income.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction u/s 32AC for investment in new plant and machinery for the first time during appellate proceedings. The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict disallowance u/s 14A to the quantum of exempt income.
What were the issues?
Eligibility of deduction for new plant and machinery claimed for the first time in appeal, and the quantum of disallowance under Section 14A when exempt income is earned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Physical hearing) Apar Industries Ltd. DCIT, CC – 6(1), Mumbai Apar House, Corporate Park, Vs 445/Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to C-43, Building No. 5, Sion Trombay road, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Chembur, Mumbai – 400071. Bandra (East), Mumbai – 400051. [PAN: AAACG1840M] Appellant / Revenue Respondent / Assessee ACIT- Mumbai M.K. Road, Mumbai – 400020. No. 5, Sion Trombay Road, Chembur, Mumbai – 400071. [PAN: AAACG1840M] Appellant / Revenue Respondent / Assessee
Assessee by Shri Vijay Mehta, CA Revenue by Shri Surendra Mohan, Sr. DR Date of Institution 18.12.2025 Date of hearing 29.04.2026 Date of pronouncement 03.06.2026
Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These cross appeals by both the parties are directed against the order of ld.
CIT(A) – 54, Mumbai dated 08.12.2025 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17. The assessee in its appeal has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
Disallowance of deduction u/
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32AC
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax-1(1)(1)… vs M/S. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation…ITA 3865/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Electrosteel Castings Ltd., (Successor… vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 990/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2017-2018
- Electrosteel Castings Ltd., (Successor… vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 989/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2016-2017
- Valeo India Private Limitedq, Chennai vs DCIT, Corporate Circle 3(1), ChennaiITA 3421/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jun 2026AY 2017-18
- Apar Industries Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC 6(1), MumbaiITA 8758/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026