VALEO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDQ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(1),CHENNAI, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that there is no prohibition in claiming both deduction under Section 32AC and depreciation under Section 32 simultaneously as they operate in distinct fields. The Tribunal also held that the provident fund contribution was paid within the extended due date, making the disallowance unwarranted.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under Section 32AC and also depreciation on plant and machinery. The AO disallowed depreciation on the ground of double benefit, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee also had a disallowance regarding provident fund contribution, where partial relief was granted by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether an assessee can claim both deduction under Section 32AC and depreciation under Section 32 on the same investment. Whether disallowance of provident fund contribution is warranted when paid within the extended due date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai -16 (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 24.09.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under: Valeo India Pvt. Ltd. :- 2 -:
“1. General
The order passed by National e- Assessment Centre, Delhi (Ld. AO' or '
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32AC
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax-1(1)(1)… vs M/S. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation…ITA 3865/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Electrosteel Castings Ltd., (Successor… vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 990/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2017-2018
- Electrosteel Castings Ltd., (Successor… vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 989/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2016-2017
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs Apar Industries Limited, MumbaiITA 1474/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
- Apar Industries Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC 6(1), MumbaiITA 8758/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026