ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LTD., (SUCCESSOR COMPANY OF SRIKALAHASTI PIPES LTD.),KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(4),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 32AC(1A) as the claim was admissible. However, since the claim was not examined by the AO, the issue was restored to the AO for limited verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed a deduction under Section 32AC(1A) of the Income Tax Act for new plant and machinery installed. This claim was not made in the original or revised return of income, leading to its rejection by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether an additional claim for deduction not made in the original or revised return can be entertained at the appellate stage. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not entertaining a legal claim when all facts were on record.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These two appeals preferred by the are assessee against the orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi,(hereinafter referred to as the “ld. CIT(A)”], dated 29.01.2026 for the Assessment Years (AY) 2016-17 and 2017-18 respectively.
The grounds raised by the assessee are as under:
“1. That, the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Kolkata-27 dated 29.01.2026 passed u/s 250(6) of the Act is arbitrary,
ITA Nos.989 & 990/Kol/2026/AY 2016-17 & 2017-18 Electrosteel Casting
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32AC
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax-1(1)(1)… vs M/S. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation…ITA 3865/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed17 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Electrosteel Castings Ltd., (Successor… vs DCIT, Central Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 990/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed14 Jul 2026AY 2017-2018
- Valeo India Private Limitedq, Chennai vs DCIT, Corporate Circle 3(1), ChennaiITA 3421/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Jun 2026AY 2017-18
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs Apar Industries Limited, MumbaiITA 1474/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
- Apar Industries Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT, CC 6(1), MumbaiITA 8758/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Jun 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026