Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT BEENA PILLAI, JM &
(Assessment Year: 2020-21) KCA Cooperative Credit Society ITO Ward-22(2)(1), Ltd. , 2, Krishna CHS Ltd. Lower Parel, St. Anthonys Road, Kalina, Vs. Mumbai-400012. Santacruz East, Mumbai-400055. PAN: AABAK0750F Appellant) : Respondent) : Shri N. G. Rao, AR Assessee by Revenue by : Shri Rajesh Sakhardande, SR-DR Date of Hearing 30.09.2025 : Date of Pronouncement : 09.10.2025 O R D E R
Per Padmavathy S, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) /Addl./JFAA, Agra [In short 'FAA'] passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 28.03.2025 for Assessment Years (AY) 2020-21. The only issue contended by the assessee is with regard to denial of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
The assessee is a co-operative society registered under the Maharashtra State Cooperative Act. The assessee filed the return of income for AY 2020-21 on 31.12.2020 declaring an income of Rs. 2,270/- after claiming deduction under chapter VIA to the tune of Rs. 6,37,984/-. The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act in which the CPC has denied the deduction claimed by the assessee under chapter VIA. Aggrieved, the assessee filed further appeal before the FAA. There was a delay of approximately 33 months in filing the appeal before the FAA. The assessee submitted that the delay was due to the change in the Management Committee and that the intimation was sent to the email Id of the earlier member of the Management Committee. Accordingly, the assessee submitted that the delay has not intentional and prayed for a condonation. The FAA however did not condone the delay in dismissed the appeal in limine.
The ld. AR presented the arguments with regard to the delay being not condoned by the FAA in spite of the assessee explaining the sufficient cause for the delay. The ld. AR on merits submitted that the assessee has claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) towards interest received from deposits held with Co- operative Banks. The ld. AR further submitted that the Co-ordinate Bench in various cases has been consistently holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) towards interest on deposits with Co-operative Banks. Accordingly, the ld. AR submitted that on merits of the issue the addition made by CPC should be deleted.
The ld. DR on the other hand submitted that the assessee has not submitted the reasonable cause for delay in filing the appeal before the FAA and the FAA has rightly dismissed the appeal in limine.
KCA Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 5. We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. We notice that the Co-ordinate Bench has been consistently holding that the income derived by way of interest from Co-operative Banks is also eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The relevant observations of the coordinate bench in Pathare Prabhu Co–operative Housing Society Ltd. vs ITO [(2023) 202 ITD 464 (Mum Trib.)] where it is held that –
We have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the material available on record. The only dispute raised by the assessee is against the disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income received from the Co-operative Banks. The assessee is a registered Co- operative Housing Society and during the assessment year 2018- 19 earned interest income of Rs. 50,39,861 from the investments made in various Co-operative Banks.
Before proceeding further, it is relevant to note the provisions of section 80P of the Act under which the assessee has claimed the deduction in the present case. As per the provisions of section 80P(1) of the Act, the income referred to in sub-section (2) to section 80P shall be allowed as a deduction to an assessee being a Co- operative Society. Further, section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, reads as under: "80P. Deduction in respect of income of co-operative societies. (1) ** ** ** (2) The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:- (a) to (c) ** ** ** (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co- operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;"
Thus, for the purpose of provisions of section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, two conditions are required to be cumulatively satisfied- (i) income by way of interest or dividend is earned by the Co-operative Society from the investments, and (ii) such investments should be with any other Co-operative Society. Further, the term „co-operative society? is defined under section 2(19) of the Act as under: "(19) "co-operative society" means a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being in force in any State for the registration of co-operative societies ;" 11. In the present case, there is no dispute that the assessee is a Co-Operative Housing Society. Thus, if any income as referred to in sub-section (2) to section KCA Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 80P of the Act is included in the gross total income of the assessee, the same shall be allowed as a deduction. It is pertinent to note that since the assessee is registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, it is required to invest or deposit its funds in one of the modes provided in section 70 of the aforesaid Act, which includes investment or deposit of funds in the District Central Cooperative Bank or the State Co-operative Bank. Accordingly, the assessee kept the deposits in Co-operative Banks registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and earned interest, which was claimed as a deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The AO denied the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on the basis that the Co-operative Bank is covered under the provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act. We find that the Hon?ble Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 123 taxmann.com 161/279 Taxman 75/431 ITR 1 while analysing the provisions of section 80P(4) of the Act held that section 80P(4) is a proviso to the main provision contained in section 80P(1) and (2) and excludes only Co-operative Banks, which are Co-operative Societies and also possesses a licence from RBI to do banking business. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further held that the limited object of section 80P(4) is to exclude Co- operative Banks that function at par with other commercial banks i.e. which lend money to members of the public. Thus, we are of the considered view that section 80P(4) of the Act is of relevance only in a case where the assessee, who is a Co- operative Bank, claims a deduction under section 80P of the Act which is not the facts of the present case. Therefore, we find no merits in the aforesaid reasoning adopted by the AO and upheld by the learned CIT(A) in denying deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the assessee.
As regards the claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, it is also pertinent to note that all Co-operative Banks are Co-operative Societies but vice versa is not true. We find that the coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently taken a view in favour of the assessee and held that even the interest earned from the Co-operative Banks is allowable as a deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. In Kaliandas Udyag Bhavan Premises Co-op Society Ltd. v. ITO [2018] 94 taxmann.com 15 (Mum.)/[ITA No. 6547/Mum./2017, dated 25-4- 2018], while dealing with the provisions of section 80P(2)(d) vis-à-vis section 80P(4) of the Act, the coordinate bench of the Tribunal observed as under: "7. ……Thus, from a perusal of the aforesaid sec. 80P(2)(d) it can safely be gathered that income by way of interest income derived by an assessee co- operative society from its investments held with any other cooperative society, shall be deducted in computing the total income of the assessee. We may herein observe, that what is relevant for claim of deduction under sec. 80P(2)(d) is that the interest income should have been derived from the investments made by the assessee co-operative society with any other cooperative society. We though are in agreement with the observations of the lower authorities that with the KCA Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. insertion of sub-section (4) of sec. 80P, vide the Finance Act, 2006, with effect from 1-4- 2007, the provisions of sec. 80P would no more be applicable in relation to any co-operative bank, other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, but however, are unable to subscribe to their view that the same shall also jeopardise the claim of deduction of a co-operative society under sec. 80P(2) (d) in respect of the interest income on their investments parked with a co- operative bank. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the issue before us and are of the considered view that as long as it is proved that the interest income is being derived by a co-operative society from its investments made with any other co-operative society, the claim of deduction under the aforesaid statutory provision, viz. sec. 80P(2)(d) would be duly available. We may herein observe that the term 'co-operative society' had been defined under sec. 2(19) of the Act, as under:- '(19) "Co-operative society" means a cooperative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being in force in any state for the registration of co- operative societies;' NEETU We are of the considered view, that though the co- operative bank pursuant to the insertion of Sub-section (4) of sec. 80P would no more be entitled for claim of deduction under sec. 80P of the Act, but however, as a co-operative bank continues to be a co-operative society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (2 of 1912), or under any other law for the time being enforced in any state for the registration of co-operative societies, therefore, the interest income derived by a co-operative society from its investments held with a cooperative bank, would be entitled for claim of deduction under sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act."
We find that the learned CIT(A) has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society [2017] 83 taxmann.com 140/395 ITR 611, wherein it was held that interest earned by the assessee, a Co-operative Society, from surplus deposits kept with a Co- operative Bank, was not eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. We find that in an earlier decision the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society [2017] 78 taxmann.com 169/392 ITR 74 held that according to section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, the amount of interest earned from a Co-operative Society Bank would be deductable from the gross income of the Co- operative Society in order to assess its total income. Thus, there are divergent views of the same Hon'ble High Court on the issue of eligibility of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest earned from Co-operative Bank. No decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court was brought to our notice on this aspect. We have to, with our highest respect to both the views of the Hon'ble High Court, adopt an objective criterion for deciding as to which decision of the Hon'ble High Court should be followed by us. We find guidance from the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. [1973] 88 ITR KCA Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.
In the aforesaid decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down a principle that "if two reasonable constructions of a taxing provisions are possible, that construction which favours the assessee must be adopted".
Therefore, in view of the above, we uphold the plea of the assessee and direct the AO to grant the deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act to the assessee in respect of interest income earned from investment with Co-operative Banks. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) for the assessment year 2018-19. As a result, grounds raised
by the assessee are allowed.
6. In assessee's case the interest is earned from deposits held with cooperative banks and accordingly in our view, the ratio laid down in the above decision is applicable to assessee's case also. Since the assessee's case is allowable on merits in our view, the same cannot be denied on the ground of technicality. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji and Ors. (167 ITR 471) held that when substantial justice and technical consideration are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred. In view of these discussions and respectfully following the above decision we hold that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) towards income derived from deposits with Co-operative Bank. We direct the AO to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee.
In result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.