NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. C.I.T,RANGE 3(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the allocation of head office expenses by the assessee was based on a reasonable allocation key and therefore, no portion of these expenses should be disallowed for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IA. The revenue's appeal on this ground was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., appealed against the CIT(A)'s confirmation of certain levies and receipts being taxed as income. The revenue also filed appeals challenging certain aspects of the CIT(A)'s orders.
What were the issues?
Whether levies and receipts collected by the assessee were taxable as income, and whether head office expenses were correctly allocated for deduction purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT1,372 citing187 ITR 688 · 1991 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders956 citing349 ITR 336 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing128 ITR 294 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswala452 citing119 Taxmann 352 · 2001 · SC
- Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT441 citing199 ITR 351 · 1993 · HC
- Saurashtra Cement and Chemical Industries Ltd. v. CIT311 citing213 ITR 523 · 1995 · HC
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT241 citing223 ITR 688 · 2016 · HC
- Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India229 citing155 ITR 120 · 1985 · SC
- CIT v. Eli Lily & Co.221 citing312 ITR 225 · 2009 · SC
- Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT201 citing30 SOT 374 · 2009 · ITAT
- P.V. Doshi v. CIT179 citing113 ITR 22 · 1978 · HC
- Nirma Industries Ltd. v. DCIT136 citing94 ITD 187 · 2006 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Nanalal Tribhovandas93 citing100 ITR 734 · 1975 · HC
- DCIT v. Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology86 citing151 Taxmann.com 434 · 2023 · SC
- Kerala State Electricity Board v. DCIT69 citing329 ITR 91 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Hotline Teletube & Components Ltd.37 citing175 Taxmann 286 · 2008 · HC
- Southern Petro Chemical Industries v. DCIT34 citing3 SOT 157 · 2005 · ITAT
- I. Dharam Pal Singh Rao v. ITO32 citing285 ITR 179 · 2006 · HC
- All Cargo Global Logistic Ltd. v. DCIT30 citing21 Taxmann 429 · 2012
- JCIT v. Holland Equipment Co. B.V30 citing97 TTJ 493 · 2005 · ITAT
- Ramco Cements Ltd. v. DCIT28 citing373 ITR 146 · 2015 · HC
- Fenner (India) Ltd. v. CIT25 citing241 ITR 803 · 2000 · HC
- M/s Tata Sons Limited v. Hon'ble Bombay ITAT24 citing76 Taxmann.com 126 · 2016 · ITAT
- Tata Sons Ltd. v. ACIT24 citing162 ITD 450 · 2017 · ITAT
- Shilpa Associates v. ITO23 citing135 Taxmann 277 · 2003
- Allahabad in Dr. V.S. Chauhan v. Director of Income-tax, Investigations21 citing336 ITR 533 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Hughes20 citing215 Taxmann 136 · 2013 · HC
- 19 citing
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “A” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Assessment Year: 1998-99 & Assessment Year: 1999-2000 & Assessment Year: 2000-01 & Assessment Year: 2001-02 & Assessment Year: 2002-03 & Assessment Year: 2003-04 & Assessment Year: 2004-05 & Assessment Year: 2005-06 Nuclear Power Corporation of ACIT, Range-3(2), India Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Vikram Sarabhai Bhavan, Vs. Mumbai-400021. Central Avenue, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai-400094. PAN NO. AAACN 3154 F Appellant Respondent
M/s Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd.. M/s Nuclear Power Corporatio ITA Nos. 202, 114, 4413/M/2004, 3867/M/2008, 4743 to 4745/M/2007, 3867/M/2008, 4743 to 4745/M/2007, 2452/M/2011 & Ors 2452/M/2011 & Ors Assessment Year: Assessment Year: 2006-07 Mumbai-400005. 400005. Avenue, Anusha
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026