← All Benches

ITAT Kolkata Bench

22,199 judgments

SRI S L DUGAR CHARITABLE TRUST,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD 1(3), EXEMPT, , KOLKATA

ITA 1006/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2021-2022

SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

CHANDRA KUMAR SUREKA,KOLKATA vs DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 3(3), KOLKATA

ITA 2681/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2014-15

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

SUNVIEW RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-5(1),KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 2637/KOL/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2011-12

Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member), Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member)

MANGALAM VINIYOG PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs I.T.O., WARD - 9(1), KOLKATA

ITA 2494/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2016-2017

Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ), Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member)

LUDLOW JUTE COMPANY LIMITED PROVIDENT FUND,KOLKATA vs A.D.I.T., CPC, BENGALURU, BENGALURU

ITA 2434/KOL/2024[2020-2021]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2020-2021

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

UMANG WEBTECH PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs I.T.O., WARD - 1(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1311/KOL/2024[2010-2011]Status: Disposed25/8/2025AY 2010-2011

Shri Rajesh Kumar (Accountant Member), Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey (Judicial Member)

DURGAPUR STEEL CITY SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION ,BARDHAMAN vs ITO, WARD 2(1), EXEMPTION,, DURGAPUR

ITA 255/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed22/8/2025AY 2015-16

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

M/S. ABHEEK DEALTRADE PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD 4(3), KOLKATA

ITA 232/KOL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed22/8/2025AY 2012-13

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

MOHAMMAD ALI,BURDWAN vs ITO, WARD 1(1),, DURGAPUR

ITA 1075/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed22/8/2025AY 2016-2017

CIT(A) through online and the appeal hearing notice not issued in registered e-mail. That in the months of March and April, 2025 I have received many message from department to avail VSVS, then I personally appeared before the A.O. immediately and the A.O. intimated me that the CIT(A) has been passed the appellate order. I enquired about appeal order and said to A/R. the current status of the appeal order. The said advocate has shown in I.T. Portal on 28.04.2025 and immediately said to him

TAPAS KUMAR GHOSH,MURSHIDABAD vs ITO, WARD-56(3), MURSHIDABAD, MURSHIDABAD

ITA 2602/KOL/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed22/8/2025AY 2021-22

him. The facts regarding this issue are recorded on page 3 of the impugned order and it is clearly mentioned that the assessee has not filed any reason why the delay should be condoned and the appeal be admitted for adjudication. Thereafter, the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A) has found that u/s 249(3) of the Act good and sufficient reasons were not presented before him for condoning the delay. Thereafter, the appeal has been dismissed without any adjudication on merits.1.1 The assessee is aggrieved with

GREENZEN BIO PVT. LTD.,SILIGURI vs ADIT, CPC, BENGALURU, KOLKATA

ITA 1101/KOL/2024[2019-2020]Status: Disposed22/8/2025AY 2019-2020

SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

INDIA CONSTRUCTION,DIAMOND HARBOUR vs ITO, WARD - 25(1), KOLKATA

ITA 2592/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed21/8/2025AY 2018-19

SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

INDANE BOTTLING PLANT LOADING AND UNLOADING LABOUR COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., ,DURGAPUR vs ACIT, CIRCLE 1, , DURGAPUR

ITA 828/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed20/8/2025AY 2018-2019

him in spite of opportunities provided. Thereafter, the Ld. AO disallowed claim of Rs.50,000/- under Section 80P of the Act and also added Rs.62,53,600/- under Section 68 of the Act, pertaining to cash deposits.1.2 The assessee carried this matter before the Ld. CIT(A) where he did not comply with the notices issued fixing the case for hearing. In fact, this specific fact is recorded in para 4 at page 4 of the impugned order. Due to this non-compliance, an adverse view has been taken at the

SURAJGOVIND ESTATES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

ITA 1186/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: Disposed19/8/2025AY 2015-2016

him and explaining relevant entries in their books of accounts. Needless to say, none of the investors appeared before the Ld. AO in response to such summons. These factors prompted the Ld. AO to make the impugned addition which duly gave credit to amounts shown against two non-resident investors viz. Ms. Pushpa Patel and Mr. Mahendra Kumar Rajivbhai Patel.

SOUTHOPEN INFRANIRMAN CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD 9(1), , KOLKATA

ITA 1268/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed18/8/2025AY 2018-2019

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

SANTANU ROY, ITO, WARD 10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs EMS POLYSET PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 2194/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed18/8/2025AY 2012-13

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

ITO, WARD 10(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs EMS POLYSET PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 2193/KOL/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed18/8/2025AY 2011-12

Shri Sonjoy Sarma (Judicial Member), Shri Sanjay Awasthi (Accountant Member)

PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1(1),, KOLKATA

ITA 664/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed14/8/2025AY 2020-2021

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

M/S. ANADYA TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD 8(1), , KOLKATA

ITA 589/KOL/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14/8/2025AY 2014-15

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

PEARL PARK BEACH RESORTS,PORT BLAIR vs I.T.O., WARD - 3(4),, PORT BLAIR

ITA 1857/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: Disposed14/8/2025AY 2016-2017

SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member), SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)