← All Benches

ITAT Hyderabad Bench

10,989 judgments

THE ADARSHA BHARATHI FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,KANEKAL vs ACIT., CIRCLE-1, KURNOOL

ITA 177/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2020-21

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

THE ADARSHA BHARATHI FARMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,KANEKAL vs ACIT., CIRCLE-1, KURNOOL

ITA 176/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2020-21

SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD (Judicial Member)

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 156/HYD/2025[2017-2018]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2017-2018

us: “1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in setting aside the assessment for fresh consideration without appreciating the fundamental fact that the original assessment was completed on a deceased person, rendering it a nullity in the eyes of law.

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRLCE 3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 155/HYD/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2016-2017

SUJATHA KANCHARLA,HYDERABAD vs DCIT., CIRCLE 6(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1233/HYD/2024[2017-2018]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2017-2018

us: “1. The impugned order of the learned Authorities below in so far as it is against the Appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, natural justice, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case.

BALAJI RAVURI,TIRUPATI vs ITO., WARD-6(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1224/HYD/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed29/4/2025AY 2011-12

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Madhusudan Sawdia (Accountant Member)

NAFEES SULTANA,HYEDERABAD. vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD.

ITA 642/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2014-15

MANILAL MODI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,HYDERABAD vs ITO., EXEMPTION WARD-1(2), AAYKAR BHAVAN, HYDERABAD

ITA 40/HYD/2025[2024-25]Status: Heard28/4/2025AY 2024-25

the Tribunal.

VAHAN MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 160/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2016-17

us : “1. The order of the Appellate Commissioner is contrary to law, facts and circumstances of the case.

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRLCE 3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 154/HYD/2025[2014-2015]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2014-2015

us: “1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in setting aside the assessment for fresh consideration without appreciating the fundamental fact that the original assessment was completed on a deceased person, rendering it a nullity in the eyes of law. 2. The learned CIT(A) misinterpreted the scope of powers under Section 251 of the Income Tax Act. Setting aside an invalid

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 149/HYD/2025[2013-2014]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2013-2014

us: “1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in setting aside the assessment for fresh consideration without appreciating the fundamental fact that the original assessment was completed on a deceased person, rendering it a nullity in the eyes of law.

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 148/HYD/2025[2012-2013]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2012-2013

LATE RAJASEKHAR CHELIKANI,HYDERABAD vs ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 147/HYD/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2011-2012

us: “1. The Learned CIT(A) erred in setting aside the assessment for fresh consideration without appreciating the fundamental fact that the original assessment was completed on a deceased person, rendering it a nullity in the eyes of law.

RAGHURAM REDDY ANTHAPPAGUDA,SECUNDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-15(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 146/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2012-13

SRINIVAS REDDY KOTHAGADI,RANGA REDDY DISTRICT vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIKARABAD

ITA 142/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2012-13

us: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order passed by the NFAC/CIT(A) is erroneous and unsustainable on facts and in law apart from being passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED CHINNA GOLKONDA,SHAMSHABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1262/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed28/4/2025AY 2017-18

us: “1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) is erroneous both on facts and in law. 2. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) is erroneous as the Hon'ble CIT (Appeals) did not issue any notice before rejecting the condonation of delay. The CIT (Appeals) is not justified in passing the appellate order without providing opportunity to the appellant. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) erred in not considering the grounds agitated

MADHUMITA TRIPATHY,HYDERABAD vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1268/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed25/4/2025AY 2013-14

Shri Vijay Pal Rao (Vice President), Shri Madhusudan Sawdia (Accountant Member)

GMR AIR CARGO AND AEROSPACE ENGINEERING LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-2(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 663/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24/4/2025AY 2016-17

GMR AIR CARGO AND AEROSPACE ENGINEERING LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs ITO., WARD-2(3), HYDERABAD

ITA 662/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed24/4/2025AY 2015-16

KRISHNA FILLING STATION,KARIMNAGAR vs ITO., WARD-2, KARIMNAGAR

ITA 52/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed24/4/2025AY 2017-18

SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Vice President), SHRI MANJUNATHA G (Accountant Member)