BALAJI RAVURI,TIRUPATI vs. ITO., WARD-6(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal. The Department's DR raised no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order dated 30/08/2024. No one appeared for the assessee during the hearing, but an application for withdrawal was filed. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia
(िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2011-12) Shri Balaji Ravuri Vs. Income Tax Officer Tirupati Ward 6 (1) PAN:ATQPR6029M Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा��रती �ारा/Assessee by: N O N E राज� व �ारा/Revenue by:: Shri Srinath Sadanala, DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 29/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 29/04/2025 आदेश/ORDER
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 30/08/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, for the A.Y.2011-12.
None has appeared on behalf of the assessee when this appeal was called for hearing. However, the assessee has filed an application for withdrawal of the present appeal in view of the matter that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad-se-
Page 1 of 3 Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (DTVSV) to settle the tax dispute. The learned DR has raised no objection, if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn as the assessee has already opted for DTVSV, 2024 to settle the tax dispute.
We have considered the application filed by the assessee which reads as under:
The learned DR has also raised no objection if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the assessee is allowed to withdraw the present appeal and consequently, the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 264
- Murugaiah Althuri, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2100/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Babu Gundlapalle, Chittoor vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, ChittoorITA 2093/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 787/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 786/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Thasil Babu, Bengaluru vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Office…ITA 785/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026